What HP Can Be Generated from a 120 CFS Water Wheel with 20-Foot Drop?

  • Thread starter Thread starter notinthebox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Water Wheel
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on estimating the horsepower (HP) that can be generated from a water wheel system utilizing a flow rate of 120 cubic feet per second (CFS) and a 20-foot drop. Participants explore theoretical calculations based on potential energy, efficiency estimates, and mechanical considerations related to the design of the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests calculating the potential energy of the water using the formula Power = mdot*g*(h1-h2), where mdot is the mass flow rate, g is gravity, and h1-h2 is the height change.
  • Another participant proposes assuming an efficiency of 25-50% for the system, indicating that real-world factors will reduce the theoretical power output.
  • A later reply clarifies that a rough estimate of power output should consider generator efficiency and losses in the flow, suggesting a 25% efficiency as a "guesstimate."
  • One participant mentions that generator efficiency could be around 90% when new, but will decrease over time, while also noting a desired speed of 1 foot per second for the water wheel.
  • Concerns are raised about water loss and mechanical inefficiencies, with one participant arguing that the best turbines achieve around 80% efficiency, while a water wheel may not reach that level.
  • Another participant challenges the assumption of zero water loss, emphasizing that mechanical and transmission losses should be factored into efficiency estimates.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the efficiency of the water wheel system, with some estimating around 25-50% efficiency while others argue that this may be overly optimistic. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact efficiency and power output that can be realistically expected from the system.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge various factors that could affect the efficiency and power output, including mechanical losses, water leakage, and the age-related decline in generator performance. The calculations presented depend on assumptions about these factors, which are not fully resolved in the discussion.

notinthebox
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I would like to findout what speed and HP I could get from a kind of water wheel.
The unit will have a gear on top and a gear on the bottem
I have over 120 cubic foot of water a second flow to play with.
the containers of water will fill and lower on drive chains and rails
They will loop around at the bottem and drainand go back up
The drop is 20 feet down no angles bot the flip over at the top and bottem let's say a 5 foot gear and no force from the water flow is added
I will have 7440 pounds of water what is the best hp I could pul from a system like that


Think of a water fall and bolting on a water system right on flat to the wall
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Have you considered just looking at the potential energy of the water? Given a mass flow rate mdot (volume flow rate multiplied by density) and the height change, you can calculate a best case power input if all of the water's potential energy were converted.

Power = mdot*g*(h1-h2)
 
I'd probably assume 25-50% efficiency along with that.
 
sorry error
The power loss looks a bit high (75 to 50%)?
14880 pounds I would like to have it speed down and around at 1 foot per second and each bucket would hold 12 cubic feet of water and there will be 20 of them.
power will be pulled (electric power from gears and or right off the drive chains
so what hp would I be able to get out of this system
 
Last edited:
We gave you everything you need to answer the question- take the mass flow rate of the water you're using (kg/s), multiply by gravity (9.81 m/s^2) and the height difference (m). This gives you the raw power in watts, and then take maybe 25% of that value to account for generator efficiency and efficiency losses in the flow.

This is a very rough estimate of the power output you might expect, not taking into account a lot of other factors which might hurt you.
 
So am I looking at best a 25% of power output for power input?
 
notinthebox said:
So am I looking at best a 25% of power output for power input?

That's Russ and I's "guesstimate" at an overall efficiency, but isn't based on a calculation. If you assume the generator is about 60% ("typical" value according to Wikipedia, so take it with a grain of salt), and losses in your wheel are around 50% (water leakage, release water before it travels the full vertical distance, friction, etc.) you're looking at 60% of 50% which is (do the math now) 0.6 * 0.5 = 0.3 = 30%.

I think 25% is probably in the ball park for what your real-world efficiency might be, but isn't the maximum efficiency theoretically possible.
 
Last edited:
generator efficiency is about 90% new it will go down with age
water loss is zero

One foot drop per second is wanted to set the size of the gear boxes

that or I might run gears on the chains out the sides to a big gear to power the generator

I will use or make 4 30 hp drive chains ( I will need to find out the size of the rods that will hold the buckets and water over est about 1600 pounds each) . That will set the size of the drive chain.

there are going to be 16 bearing
 
Water loss is not zero: the best turbines are around 80% efficient and you won't get anywhere near that for a water wheel. The wiki says 60% is the max.

With the generator loss and mechanical transmission loss, 50% overall for the high end of the range was too high.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
15K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
14K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K