What if a particle had infinite mass?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the theoretical implications of a particle possessing infinite mass within an infinite potential well. Participants conclude that as mass approaches infinity, the wave function becomes increasingly narrow, suggesting a well-defined position. The analysis references the particle-in-a-box model, indicating that as mass tends to infinity, oscillatory behavior ceases, resulting in a non-oscillating state. Ultimately, this leads to nonsensical energy equations, where all energy levels yield zero energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Understanding of wave functions
  • Familiarity with the particle-in-a-box model
  • Basic knowledge of potential wells
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of infinite mass in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the particle-in-a-box model in detail
  • Investigate the behavior of wave functions under extreme conditions
  • Analyze energy equations in quantum systems with varying mass
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, physicists exploring theoretical models, and anyone interested in the implications of mass on wave functions and energy states.

trelek2
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm wondering what will happen to the wave function of a particle when we take its mass to infinity.

Suppose the infinite particle is in an infinite potential well, how do we sketch the wave function?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
trelek2 said:
Hi, I'm wondering what will happen to the wave function of a particle when we take its mass to infinity.

Suppose the infinite particle is in an infinite potential well, how do we sketch the wave function?
I didn't run any number. I don't think an infinite mass is realistic. The best I can think of is to let the mass tends to infinity. When the mass is "big", you should fall over classical mechanics. That would mean that in the "infinite potential" the wavefunction is probably narrow (which means a somehow well defined position).
Just a guess though.
 
This is unphysical, but...

Simply take the solution to the particle-in-a-box and let m->inf. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_in_a_box

The w in the e^-iwt term goes to zero, so the whole thing vanishes. You're left with a particle that doesn't oscillate at its initial state, which is going to be some superposition of Acos(kx) + Bsin(kx).

Looking at the energy equations, you can see this quickly leads to nonsense; for example, no matter the energy level of the system (n) the system would have zero energy!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K