What is a less painful way to study Lagrangian Mechanics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Principal of Least Action, with participants expressing a shared interest in the topic but frustration with the complexity of existing materials. One participant highlights "The Lazy Universe" by Professor Jennifer Coopersmith as an accessible introduction that provides historical context, though acknowledges the challenge of progressing to more technical understanding, as modern physics is heavily mathematical. Suggestions for further reading include "Emmy Noether's Wonderful Theorem" and "Classical Dynamics" by Greenwood, with an emphasis on finding niche textbooks that present the material in unique ways. Participants also share personal experiences with studying advanced mechanics, noting that familiarity with Lagrangian formalism can enhance comprehension. The conversation underscores the need for resources that balance intuition and technical competence in understanding the Principal of Least Action.
lagrangian90
Messages
0
Reaction score
1
I am a software engineer/mechanical engineer highly intrigued by the Principal of Least Action. However, a lot of the material on this subject is very tedious and painful to read. I did find one super awesome textbook called The Lazy Universe, by Professor Jennifer Coopersmith. It was an awesome intro to some aspects of the Principal of Least Action...and also built up a great historical context behind the invention of the subject. But...how can I build off this? I want to build more intuition on the subject. Any awesome articles or niche content that you've found?

Also, if anyone is actively putting time into studying this subject, let me know how you've gone about it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lagrangian90 said:
I am a software engineer/mechanical engineer highly intrigued by the Principal of Least Action. However, a lot of the material on this subject is very tedious and painful to read. I did find one super awesome textbook called The Lazy Universe, by Professor Jennifer Coopersmith. It was an awesome intro to some aspects of the Principal of Least Action...and also built up a great historical context behind the invention of the subject. But...how can I build off this? I want to build more intuition on the subject. Any awesome articles or niche content that you've found?
The overview of this book on Amazon says:

It aims to explain ideas rather than achieve technical competence.

There is probably nowhere to go after this book in terms of a purely non-technical understanding. Ultimately, modern physics is a highly mathematical subject. There's no getting round that.
lagrangian90 said:
Also, if anyone is actively putting time into studying this subject, let me know how you've gone about it.
Most of us on here are interested in technical competence! I have a copy of Emmy Noether's Wonderful Theorem, by the late Dwight Neuenschwander.

https://books.google.co.uk/books/ab...rful_Theorem.html?id=h6yODgAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

The material in that book, however, is generally advanced undergraduate. You would need to be a serious physics student to get a lot out of that book.
 
  • Like
Likes lagrangian90
Maybe I am lucky for not having found Lagrangians painful. I went through the Goldstein by myself because our teacher was a mess, and even with all that I found Lagrangian formalism beautiful. I think that what is key is that if you are already very accustomed to advanced mechanics problems you would see why the Lagrangian is extremely helpful. The Lagrangian asks you to write the coordinates of a system very precisely and you should be able to master that already for Newtonian problems.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes lagrangian90 and PeroK
The Goldstein book looks like a great resource. I think I am going to buy a copy and put some time into that. I've been successful in the past with a few tough subjects (e.g., quantum computing) by finding more "niche" textbooks that cover topics from a slightly different angle or with a slightly unconventional style.

Emmy Noether's Wonderful Theorem looks like a great resource as well, I am going to bookmark this.

Thank you for the help here.
 
There’s also a Dover book that you might try
Classical Dynamics by Greenwood
 
  • Like
Likes lagrangian90
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...

Similar threads

Back
Top