What is a principal null direction

  • Thread starter Thread starter purakanui
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction
Click For Summary
A principal null direction is defined as an eigenvector of the Riemann tensor, specifically a null vector that satisfies certain conditions related to the Maxwell tensor and the Riemann tensor. The discussion highlights the mathematical representation of principal null vectors, including the equation kαFαν ∝ kν for the Maxwell tensor. Participants also address the complexities of expanding anti-symmetric parts of tensors, particularly when involving multiple tensors. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these mathematical concepts in the context of gravitational wave research. Overall, the thread provides insights into the theoretical framework necessary for studying colliding plane gravitational waves.
purakanui
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I am starting my honours project on colliding plane gravitational waves and I am learning about the Petrov-Penrose classification of the Weyl tensor. I can't find any good explanation on what a principal null direction is.

Thanks

Chris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A principal null vector is an eigenvector of the Riemann tensor. Consider first the Maxwell tensor Fμν. A principal null vector of the Maxwell tensor is a null vector kν such that kαFαν ∝ kν. An equivalent way of writing this is kαFα[νkσ] = 0. Similarly a principal null vector of the Riemann tensor is a null vector such that

kαkRν]αβ[σkτ]kβ = 0
 
Thanks for that!
 
I am actually having a little trouble with the anti-symmetric part of your answer. I understand that T_{[ab]} = \frac{1}{2}(T_{ab}-T_{ba}). But how do you expand when the square brackets go over more than one tensor? I.e. in K^aF_{a[v}K_{\sigma]} = 0?
Thanks again
 
purakanui said:
I am actually having a little trouble with the anti-symmetric part of your answer. I understand that T_{[ab]} = \frac{1}{2}(T_{ab}-T_{ba}). But how do you expand when the square brackets go over more than one tensor? I.e. in K^aF_{a[v}K_{\sigma]} = 0?
Thanks again

K^aF_{a[v}K_{\sigma]} = \frac{1}{2} \left( K^aF_{a v}K_\sigma - K^aF_{a \sigma}K_v \right)
 
Cool, thought that would be the case.
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K