What is a useful way to talk about eigenstates of the position operator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the understanding of eigenstates of the position operator in quantum mechanics, particularly in relation to the time-independent Schrödinger equation for the simple harmonic oscillator (SHO). The participant highlights confusion regarding the treatment of position as a variable and the implications of wavefunction collapse into delta functions, which are identified as the eigenstates of the position operator. The conversation also touches on the relationship between the position operator and the raising and lowering operators in the context of the SHO, as well as the foundational concepts of the Born rule and the uncertainty principle.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics fundamentals, including the Schrödinger equation.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of eigenstates and eigenvalues in quantum systems.
  • Knowledge of the simple harmonic oscillator (SHO) model in quantum mechanics.
  • Basic grasp of the Born rule and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the derivation of eigenstates for the position operator in quantum mechanics.
  • Study the relationship between the position operator and raising/lowering operators in the context of the SHO.
  • Investigate the implications of wavefunction collapse and delta functions as eigenstates.
  • Learn about the spectral theorem and its application in quantum mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists specializing in quantum theory, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of eigenstates and the mathematical framework of quantum systems.

dudemanguy333
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
So I've been having a specific major hang-up when it comes to understanding basic quantum mechanics, which is the position operator.

For the SHO, the time independent Schroedinger's equation looks like

<br /> E\psi = \frac{\hat{p}^2}{2m}\psi + \frac{1}{2}mw^2\hat{x}^2\psi<br />

Except that usually it isn't written with \hat{x} but with x. What really showed me that I didn't understand this was an extra credit problem on an exam today, where

<br /> E\psi = \frac{\hat{p}^2}{2m}\psi + \frac{1}{2}mw^2z^2\psi + az\sigma_z + b\sigma_z<br />

and to solve it we needed to show that H and \sigma_z commuted, then show some other business. But to treat z as a variable seemed incorrect, since to do that, we would need to be using a basis of its eigenstates. I also got confused when thinking about the collapse of observing position onto a single position, which would transform the wavefunction in x into a delta function. It seems, then, that delta functions are the eigenstates of our position operator, since an observation collapses our wave function into one. Then writing wave functions in the variable x would be turning that infinite-dimensional basis of delta functions into a different basis. Alternately, if we assume that we are in the state |x>, the quantum number for this state would be x, and so \hat{x}|x&gt;=x|x&gt;

Is any of this along a good line of though?



Also, the solutions to eigenstates of H for the SHO write the x operator as a sum of raising and lowering operators. I could probably find the eigenstates for x in terms of the SHO basis. Will the basis of x be the same for any problem, and will it then make \hat{p}=i\hbar\frac{d}{dx} the same when I am using this basis. What should I call this basis, function space?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Eigenstates are the quantum mechanical equivalent of the classical concept of eigenvalues. They are the basis of the spectral theorem and the interpretation of the quantum state as a superposition of eigenstates. The Born rule is an approximation to the more precise Dirac equation, and is the basis of the interpretation of the quantum state as a probability amplitude. The uncertainty principle is the quantum mechanical formalism of the Heisenberg principle of uncertainty, and is the basis of the interpretation of quantum systems as being intrinsically unpredictable.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
943
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
599
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
351