What Is Dimensional Regularization in Arbitrary Dimensions?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ice109
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Regularization
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of dimensional regularization in the context of evaluating integrals in arbitrary dimensions, particularly focusing on a specific integral related to quantum field theory. Participants explore the mathematical formulation and implications of performing integrals in dimensions beyond the conventional four.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an integral and notes its divergence in four dimensions, introducing the concept of evaluating it in arbitrary dimensions.
  • Another participant questions the meaning of "arbitrary dimensions" and expresses confusion regarding the variables D and Δ, as well as the beta function B.
  • A later reply clarifies that the integral is evaluated over all space and that D represents the dimensionality of the space, while Δ is a constant.
  • Participants discuss the mathematical steps involved in the integral, including the use of gamma functions and the relationship between dimensions.
  • There is a mention of mistakes in the initial write-up, indicating a lack of clarity in the presentation of the problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the integral and the concept of dimensional regularization. There is no consensus on the clarity of the initial explanation or the definitions of certain terms.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include unclear definitions of terms such as "arbitrary dimensions," the beta function, and the specific regions of integration. Some mathematical steps remain unresolved, and the discussion reflects a mix of exploratory reasoning and technical detail.

ice109
Messages
1,708
Reaction score
6
i'm doing an integral for my advisor that is way beyond me but i have pages from a textbook that tell me how to do it so here goes

[tex]\int\frac{d^4\ell}{(2\pi)^4}\frac{1}{(\ell^2+A^2)^2} = \frac{1}{2}B(0,2)[/tex]

which is divergent

but in arbitrary dimensions

you get

[tex]\int\frac{d^4\ell}{(2\pi)^4}\frac{1}{(\ell^2+A^2)^2} = \frac{1}{(4\pi)^\frac{D}{2}}\frac{\Gamma (2-\frac{D}{2})}{\Gamma (2)}(\frac{1}{A})^{2-\frac{D}{2}}[/tex]

and setting [tex]\epsilon = 4-D[/tex]

and then letting D approach 4 we get

[tex]\frac{1}{(4\pi)^{2}}(\frac{2}{\epsilon}-log\Delta - \gamma +log(4\pi) + O(\epsilon))[/tex]

where

[tex]\gamma \approx .5772[/tex]

the thing is i only understand why this works on a very very superficial level. something along the lines of taking a limit and studying behavior as the limit approaches a "pole." but i really have no intuitive clue as to what an integral in arbitrary space even means. can anyone give me some sense of what's going on.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anybody? anybody? maybe this should be moved into atomic physics
 
4 dimensional calculus is the same as 3 dimensional calculus, except for the extra dimension.

You appear to be leaving out some details. I imagine that l is supposed to be a vector quantity, and that you have some particular regions of integration in mind that you haven't shared with us.

I don't know what "arbitrary dimensions" means, or from where D and [itex]\Delta[/itex] came. The meaning of B is not obvious to me from the context either.

LaTeX tip: use \left( and \right) to make large parentheses. (You can replace parentheses with other symbols too)
 
Last edited:
Hurkyl said:
4 dimensional calculus is the same as 3 dimensional calculus, except for the extra dimension.

You appear to be leaving out some details. I imagine that l is supposed to be a vector quantity, and that you have some particular regions of integration in mind that you haven't shared with us.

I don't know what "arbitrary dimensions" means, or from where D and [itex]\Delta[/itex] came. The meaning of B is not obvious to me from the context either.

LaTeX tip: use \left( and \right) to make large parentheses. (You can replace parentheses with other symbols too)

ahh I've made lots of mistakes in the write up

[tex]\int\frac{d^D\ell}{(2\pi)^D}\frac{1}{(\ell^2+\Delta)^ 2} = \frac{1}{(4\pi)^\frac{D}{2}}\frac{\Gamma (2-\frac{D}{2})}{\Gamma (2)}\left(\frac{1}{\Delta}\right)^{2-\frac{D}{2}}[/tex]

region of integration is all of space. yes [itex]\ell[/itex] is a vector,arbitrary dimensions means just that, instead of 3 or 4 , D and it comes from how to solve that integral.
[itex]\Delta[/itex] is just a constant and B is the beta function.


don't mind this stuff, something i started typing out before i realized my initial write up was completely retarded. if you need to know how to work out the integral i'll finish that up.

[tex]\int\frac{d^D\ell}{(2\pi)^D}\frac{1}{(\ell^2+\Delta)^ 2} = \int\frac{d\Omega_{D}}{(2\pi^D)}}\int^{0}_{\infty}d\ell\frac{\ell^{D-1}}{(\ell^2+\Delta)^2}= \frac{2(\sqrt{\pi})^D}{\Gamma(\frac{D}{2})}\left([/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K