What is electrostatic noise and how does it affect analog and digital signals?

Click For Summary
Electrostatic noise is caused by parasitic capacitive coupling between varying voltage sources and signal lines, affecting analog signals more significantly than digital ones. Analog receivers detect amplitude variations and cannot distinguish between desired signals and noise, leading to audible interference. In contrast, digital signals can ignore noise below a certain threshold, allowing for error correction and maintaining signal integrity. The discussion highlights that while electrostatic noise is not well-defined in common resources, it is linked to static interference often experienced in radio communications. Overall, the impact of electrostatic noise varies between analog and digital systems, with each having different responses to interference.
treehouse
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
I started an electrical engineering degree this semester. My book says that electrostatic noise meaningfully affects analog but not digital. But it does not say what electrostatic noise is, and neither Google nor Wikipedia readily yield an answer to this question: What is electrostatic noise?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You sure you are not refer to thermal noise(from resistance), flicker noise (1/f noise that is device dependent), current noise ( I don't remember the name! Too old!). Even DC current is not totally smooth as it sounds, it is only time average, at any instance, the current is not even and noise is produced.
 
yungman said:
You sure you are not refer to thermal noise(from resistance), flicker noise (1/f noise that is device dependent), current noise ( I don't remember the name! Too old!). Even DC current is not totally smooth as it sounds, it is only time average, at any instance, the current is not even and noise is produced.

The book says 'electrostatic noise', a term which isn't even in its index. But I guess resistance does result from electrostatic forces (since subatomic particles, including those that compose different atoms, never really touch - its just their electrostatic fields that interact).
 
I have not heard about it don't mean it does not exist, I am no expert on noise. I remember now, the uneven DC current due to electrons passing through is called Shot noise.
 
Electrostatic noise is caused by parasitic, or unintended, capacitive coupling between varying voltage sources and the signal lines.
Imaging a very low value air capacitor, (less than 1pf) connected between a varying voltage source and your signal line.
http://www.vtiinstruments.com/SupportBx4Qans.aspx?FaqID=115
 
treehouse said:
I started an electrical engineering degree this semester. My book says that electrostatic noise meaningfully affects analog but not digital. But it does not say what electrostatic noise is, and neither Google nor Wikipedia readily yield an answer to this question: What is electrostatic noise?

This doesn't tell us the context of the noise. I read it as referring to what they often call 'static' interference on radio receivers. It's rather a vague term afaiac. 'Static' noise is not the familiar 'white noise' hiss but tends to consist of random impulsive spikes. It is caused by lightning, car ignition sparks, motors etc. and can be very noticeable.

The difference between digital and analogue signals is that an analogue receiver just detects the amplitude (or frequency) of the received carrier wave and presents this as a varying voltage to the loudspeaker. It cannot distinguish between wanted program or splats and noise so they are audible on the output. A transmitted digital signal is 'expected' by the receiver, to have certain values (perhaps just 0 or 1 - but most broadcast digital signals use more levels). If the noise / splats are below a certain level then the receiver can just ignore them because it correctly decides which value was intended and it can convert the digital information to exactly the same as what went in at the transmitter / studio. A decent digital transmission system can cope with occasional high spikes by using error-correction but it will eventually 'die' at a high enough interference level and the receiver mutes. Under the same conditions, a conventional analogue receiver may well operate still but with a disturbing level of background noise - it 'dies gracefully' so it may, in fact be better in some circumstances (comms rather than entertainment).
 
I am trying to understand how transferring electric from the powerplant to my house is more effective using high voltage. The suggested explanation that the current is equal to the power supply divided by the voltage, and hence higher voltage leads to lower current and as a result to a lower power loss on the conductives is very confusing me. I know that the current is determined by the voltage and the resistance, and not by a power capability - which defines a limit to the allowable...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
8K