What is geometric group theory and how does it relate to different geometries?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of geometric group theory and its relationship with various geometries. Participants explore its definitions, applications, and connections to other mathematical structures, particularly in the context of physics and geometry.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express interest in geometric group theory, noting its obscurity for those with a physics background and seeking resources or personal insights.
  • One participant suggests that geometric group theory relates to graph theory and crystallography, indicating it encompasses more than just symmetry groups of crystals.
  • Another participant describes geometric group theory as the application of group theory to geometry, mentioning the inclusion of concepts like group actions and general linear groups.
  • There is a discussion about Lie groups, with participants noting their broader applications beyond standard groups and their relationship to linear transformations.
  • One participant references historical figures like Lie and Noether, suggesting that the calculus of variations is foundational to the subject, and mentions the interconnectedness of concepts in mathematics.
  • A participant raises a question about "conversation laws," leading to a clarification that the intended term was likely "conservation laws." This prompts a discussion about terminology and its implications.
  • Another participant introduces Felix Klein's Erlangen program as a relevant topic within geometric group theory.
  • There is a query regarding the state of the art in lattice gauge theory and its fit within the discussion.
  • One participant notes that geometries are classified by groups acting on objects that preserve basic structures, mentioning translations in Euclidean geometry but lacking details on others due to internet issues.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the definitions and applications of geometric group theory, with no clear consensus on its scope or the relationship to lattice theory. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the connections between these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific mathematical concepts and historical figures without fully resolving the definitions or implications of these terms. There are indications of missing assumptions and dependencies on definitions that are not clarified within the discussion.

diegzumillo
Messages
180
Reaction score
20
Hey all
I previously asked about some math structure fulfilling some requirements and didn't get much out of it ( Graph or lattice topology discretization ). It was a vague question, granted.

Anyway, I seem to have stumbled upon something interesting called geometric group theory. It looks relatively obscure, at least for someone with a physics background, and I would like to know more about it. Anyone has any idea where to start? The wikipedia page has many references, but if anyone wants to add some more to the pile or some personal comments I would really appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
diegzumillo said:
Hey all
I previously asked about some math structure fulfilling some requirements and didn't get much out of it ( Graph or lattice topology discretization ). It was a vague question, granted.

Anyway, I seem to have stumbled upon something interesting called geometric group theory. It looks relatively obscure, at least for someone with a physics background, and I would like to know more about it. Anyone has any idea where to start? The wikipedia page has many references, but if anyone wants to add some more to the pile or some personal comments I would really appreciate it.
Sounds like graph theory or crystallography which should not sound obscure to someone with a physics background. I've recently had a short glimpse in it and found out, that it is far more than a few symmetry groups of crystals. And graph theory is an entire branch of mathematics, too.
 
Lie groups , in my experience, are part of it. It is, as the name suggests, the application of group theory to geometry. In many cases you also include concepts like group actions, general linear groups.
 
WWGD said:
Lie groups , in my experience, are part of it. It is, as the name suggests, the application of group theory to geometry. In many cases you also include concepts like group actions, general linear groups.
I think it's more the application of analysis to linear transformations. We always have the simple standard groups in mind when we say Lie group. However, they cover a far wider range. And they are not automatically subgroups of some general linear group, it's a theorem.
 
fresh_42 said:
I think it's more the application of analysis to linear transformations. We always have the simple standard groups in mind when we say Lie group. However, they cover a far wider range. And they are not automatically subgroups of some general linear group, it's a theorem.
Could be. I was describing an approx. to the syllabus I saw for this class. And you're right, they are not always subgroups of ##GL(n,\mathbb F)##.
 
WWGD said:
Could be. I was describing an approx. to the syllabus I saw for this class. And you're right, they are not always subgroups of ##GL(n,\mathbb F)##.
I think Ado says they are for some ##n## but I haven't checked the details. If we go back to Lie and Noether, then it was actually the calculus of variations which originated the subject. In the end it turned out that conversation laws are encoded in Lie groups. A typical case of Zen: Everything is connected with everything. Although I think it was Humboldt who said it.
 
Conversation laws?
 
Oops. Yes, that is what I meant by english is terribly bad at error correcting. And I haven't even the excuse of dyslexia. It would fit so well in this case.
 
fresh_42 said:
Oops. Yes, that is what I meant by english is terribly bad at error correcting. And I haven't even the excuse of dyslexia. It would fit so well in this case.
I guess it was conversion?
 
  • #10
WWGD said:
I guess it was conversion?
My suspicion is that it is due to a deep dislike of the word conservare, i.e. the associations of it.
 
  • #11
I guess you meant call conversion? And, how about including your paysan Felix Klein's Erlangen program in geometric g.t?
 
  • #12
Sounds good, although I'm not so sure that lattice theory fits in as mentioned in the OP.

What is state of the art in lattice gauge theory?
 
  • #13
Not sure what you mean. Here geometries are classified by the groups acting on objects, that preserve basic structure . Translation for Euclidean geometry I remember, but not the others. My internet is down now, so I can't check.
..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
413
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K