What is going on with the indices

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter vertices
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Indices
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
vertices
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
If:

[tex]\delta x^\mu = a^\mu +w^{\mu}_{\nu}x^\nu[/tex]

How would we go about working out

[tex]\delta_1 \delta_2 x^\mu[/tex]

This is apparently equal to:

[tex](w^{\mu}_{1}_\nu a^{\nu}_{2} + w^{\mu}_{1}_\lambda w^{\lambda}_{2}_\nu) x^\nu[/tex]

but I can't understand what is going on with the indices - can someone help me out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


What's the context, the answer depends on what these things are. I'm assuming that [tex]\delta x^{\mu}[/tex] is some sort of variation of a coordinate and you're expanding it about some point [tex]a^{\mu}[/tex] and only keeping terms up to order 1 in x. What do the subscripts on your deltas mean? I can get some results similar to what you propose as an answer but it depends on how I interpret.

For example if I apply delta on the first line: [tex]\delta(a^{\mu}+\omega^{\mu}_{\nu}x^{\nu})=\delta(a^{\mu})+\omega^{\mu}_{\nu}\delta(x^{\nu})[/tex]

where I've assumed the matrix [tex]\omega^{\mu}_{\nu}[/tex] is constant. Then just vary the x term again. I'm assuming that the variation of the 'a' term is zero and so I wonder about your parantheses. But I can't be sure until I know that these letters represent.
 
Last edited:


It's presumably an infinitesimal Poincare transformation (translation + Lorentz), so

[tex] \delta_1 \delta_2 x^\mu = \delta_1 (a_2^\mu +{w_2^{\mu}}_{\nu}x^\nu) = a_1^\mu + {w_1^\mu}_\nu a_2^\nu +{w_1^\mu}_\nu {w_2^{\nu}}_{\lambda} x^\lambda .[/tex]

This is a bit different than what's written down in the OP.