What is going on with the indices

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter vertices
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Indices
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the computation of the double variation of a coordinate, specifically the expression for \(\delta_1 \delta_2 x^\mu\). The participants clarify that this expression can be derived from the initial variation formula \(\delta x^\mu = a^\mu + w^{\mu}_{\nu}x^\nu\), leading to the conclusion that \(\delta_1 \delta_2 x^\mu\) equals \((w^{\mu}_{1\nu} a^{\nu}_{2} + w^{\mu}_{1\lambda} w^{\lambda}_{2\nu}) x^\nu\). The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the indices and the context of the variations, which are interpreted as infinitesimal Poincaré transformations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor notation and index manipulation
  • Familiarity with Poincaré transformations in theoretical physics
  • Knowledge of variations in the context of differential geometry
  • Basic grasp of matrix operations and their applications in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Poincaré transformations in detail
  • Learn about tensor calculus and its applications in physics
  • Explore the concept of variations in Lagrangian mechanics
  • Investigate the implications of index notation in theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, mathematicians working with differential geometry, and students studying advanced topics in relativity and field theory.

vertices
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
If:

[tex]\delta x^\mu = a^\mu +w^{\mu}_{\nu}x^\nu[/tex]

How would we go about working out

[tex]\delta_1 \delta_2 x^\mu[/tex]

This is apparently equal to:

[tex](w^{\mu}_{1}_\nu a^{\nu}_{2} + w^{\mu}_{1}_\lambda w^{\lambda}_{2}_\nu) x^\nu[/tex]

but I can't understand what is going on with the indices - can someone help me out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


What's the context, the answer depends on what these things are. I'm assuming that [tex]\delta x^{\mu}[/tex] is some sort of variation of a coordinate and you're expanding it about some point [tex]a^{\mu}[/tex] and only keeping terms up to order 1 in x. What do the subscripts on your deltas mean? I can get some results similar to what you propose as an answer but it depends on how I interpret.

For example if I apply delta on the first line: [tex]\delta(a^{\mu}+\omega^{\mu}_{\nu}x^{\nu})=\delta(a^{\mu})+\omega^{\mu}_{\nu}\delta(x^{\nu})[/tex]

where I've assumed the matrix [tex]\omega^{\mu}_{\nu}[/tex] is constant. Then just vary the x term again. I'm assuming that the variation of the 'a' term is zero and so I wonder about your parantheses. But I can't be sure until I know that these letters represent.
 
Last edited:


It's presumably an infinitesimal Poincare transformation (translation + Lorentz), so

[tex] \delta_1 \delta_2 x^\mu = \delta_1 (a_2^\mu +{w_2^{\mu}}_{\nu}x^\nu) = a_1^\mu + {w_1^\mu}_\nu a_2^\nu +{w_1^\mu}_\nu {w_2^{\nu}}_{\lambda} x^\lambda .[/tex]

This is a bit different than what's written down in the OP.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
861
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K