What IS happening with photon frequency?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of photons and what constitutes their oscillation, exploring concepts in quantum physics, electromagnetic fields, and the relationship between classical and quantum descriptions of light. Participants express confusion about the oscillatory nature of photons, the implications for energy, and the distinction between different states of light.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions what is oscillating in a photon, suggesting it might be the energy, which raises concerns about conservation of energy.
  • Another participant clarifies that the energy of a photon remains constant and that it is the electromagnetic field that oscillates, but acknowledges a lack of understanding of the correspondence between photons and the field.
  • Several participants discuss different quantum states of light, including Fock states and coherent states, noting that coherent states do not have a definite number of photons.
  • There is mention of the photon number distribution in coherent states being Poissonian, leading to discussions about the relationship between classical electromagnetic waves and quantum descriptions.
  • A participant introduces the concept of thermal states and their relevance to Bose-Einstein condensates, emphasizing the need for a fixed number of particles for such states.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about the meaning of photons and suggests that the concept may not align with everyday experiences, emphasizing that photons are quantized excitations of the electromagnetic field.
  • Some participants reflect on the implications of viewing photons as models rather than concrete entities, questioning the nature of what is changing in wave-like patterns.
  • One participant outlines their understanding of photons, stating that they are not merely short pulses or segments of classical waves, but rather quanta resulting from mathematical operations on the electromagnetic field.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a range of views on the nature of photons, with some agreeing on the oscillation of the electromagnetic field while others question the clarity and meaning of the photon concept itself. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing interpretations and models presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with quantum mechanics and mathematics, indicating that some foundational knowledge may be necessary to fully engage with the concepts discussed. There are also references to specific experiments and theoretical frameworks that may not be universally understood among all participants.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring the foundations of quantum mechanics, the nature of light, and the relationship between classical and quantum physics, particularly students or individuals new to these concepts.

  • #31
Lie Algebra hmm.. nice.
Your explanations are sound I just have just a simple doubt that in earlier posts you saidbthe mass in the matter was due to quarks .But what about the interactions that take place between them as if we would literally add their masses for a simple nucleus it would come out to be larger than the observed.I think that mass due to quarks is a bit ambigous statement.
(Please clarify my doubts)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I believe that the interactions represent Strong Nuclear Force binding energy, and I'm not clear that it "adds" to the mass.
 
  • #33
Alanine said:
Lie Algebra hmm.. nice.
Your explanations are sound I just have just a simple doubt that in earlier posts you said the mass in the matter was due to quarks .But what about the interactions that take place between them as if we would literally add their masses for a simple nucleus it would come out to be larger than the observed.I think that mass due to quarks is a bit ambiguous statement.

I was a bit sloppy. Most of the mass in ordinary matter is due to the strong interaction,
generated dynamically through dynamical symmetry breaking. This results in constituent quark masses. These approximately add up to proton and neutron masses, and from these to the masses of atoms and molecules, and finally of the solids and fluids that make up our everyday world. The deviations are due to the fact that mass and energy are inter-convertible to some extent, and that the binding energy takes away a bit from particles bound together.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K