What is Historically Inaccurate About Enrico Fermi's Famous Photo?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ZapperZ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Picture
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a famous image of Enrico Fermi, specifically the equation he wrote on a blackboard, which has sparked debate among physicists and historians. The main issue identified is a mistake in the expression for the fine structure constant, α, which should be α = e²/ħc. Some participants suggest that Fermi's error might have been intentional, reflecting his sense of humor, while others argue that it was simply a mistake. The conversation also touches on Fermi's personality, with anecdotes about his fondness for humor and the possibility that he owned multiple identical suits. The thread highlights the ongoing fascination with Fermi's legacy and the playful nature of scientific discourse.
ZapperZ
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
32,814
Reaction score
4,725
OK, if you've read this in Physics Today or some other publications, you should disqualify yourself.

This is one of the most famous picture of Enrico Fermi. Yet, this picture has been a constant 'debate' among many physicists and science historians. Can you spot what is the issue with this picture?

http://www.phy.mtu.edu/images/area/EnricoFermi.jpg

Zz.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Guess he messed up alpha. :biggrin:
 
Fermi was left-handed?
 
Danger said:
Fermi was left-handed?
:smile: That was my guess initially.
 
The partial wrt t of what?
 
Integral said:
The partial wrt t of what?
I guess he's just writing the operators.

I'll go for the "alpha", since if alpha is ment to be the fine structure constant, he's switched e and h.
 
Ooh was he left handed?
 
Looks like he erased something in the Hamiltonian - replaced "+" with "-"? A sign error?
 
I see it! Neutrino found it, it's the alpha.
 
  • #10
Looks more like a written spoonerism than an error.
 
  • #11
  • #12
What is wrong with this picture, of course, is the expresson for alpha, the fine structure constant. It should have been

\alpha = \frac{e^2}{\hbar c}[/itex]<br /> <br /> Physicists seem to have argued over this image for years. Many see it for what it is - Fermi made a mistake. Others who knew Fermi very well and understand his sense of humor (and his sometime &quot;childlike&quot; quality as evident in his fondnes for http://mydisneymania.blogspot.com/2006/09/enrico-fermi-and-pooh.html&quot; ) point to the &quot;twinkle&quot; in his eyes and believe that he was pulling a fast one.<br /> <br /> Either way, it made for a great conversation piece.<br /> <br /> Zz.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #14
It's on a stamp
fermi-stamp.jpg

http://www.dantealighieri.net/cambridge/Photos_Nobel/fermi_stamp.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • #15
robphy said:
It's on a stamp
fermi-stamp.jpg

This picture looks like it was taken at the same photoshoot as the other picture. Looks like the same suit, and the diagram is the same.
 
  • #16
He died a pretty long time ago, as this thread itself has. Why resurrect it?
 
  • #17
ZapperZ said:
What is wrong with this picture, of course, is the expresson for alpha, the fine structure constant. It should have been

\alpha = \frac{e^2}{\hbar c}[/itex]<br /> <br /> Physicists seem to have argued over this image for years. Many see it for what it is - Fermi made a mistake. Others who knew Fermi very well and understand his sense of humor (and his sometime &quot;childlike&quot; quality as evident in his fondnes for http://mydisneymania.blogspot.com/2006/09/enrico-fermi-and-pooh.html&quot; ) point to the &quot;twinkle&quot; in his eyes and believe that he was pulling a fast one.<br /> <br /> Either way, it made for a great conversation piece.<br /> <br /> Zz.
Uh, is it just me or does Zapper&#039;s last post bear great similarity to this page:<br /> http://www.anl.gov/Media_Center/ArgonneNow/Fall_2006/Fermi_equation_conundrum.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #18
Dang, posting to dead threads again!
 
  • #19
lisab said:
This picture looks like it was taken at the same photoshoot as the other picture. Looks like the same suit, and the diagram is the same.

He's wearing the same suit and tie in this picture: http://www.historyplace.com/specials/calendar/docs-pix/enrico-fermi.jpg

Did he own any other suits?

Was he like Hari Seldon and owned an entire closet of the exact same suit?

I once owned 24 T-shirts with the exact same color and design. They were left over from a "Conference on the Future" or something like that and had an Einstein quote on them. My brother-in-law is a policeman and he was moonlighting as a security guard for the event. After the conference, when they were disposing of the left over stuff, he figured I might like a box of T-shirts. Trouble is that the neighbors didn't know how many of the T-shirts I owned and just figured that must be my lucky T-shirt or something. They were afraid to come close enough to talk to me because they figured it had to start smelling pretty bad after wearing it for around 12 days straight.
 
Last edited:
  • #20
Defennder said:
Uh, is it just me or does Zapper's last post bear great similarity to this page:
http://www.anl.gov/Media_Center/ArgonneNow/Fall_2006/Fermi_equation_conundrum.html

It had no comment about Winnie the Pooh!

:)

Zz.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #21
Defennder said:
Uh, is it just me or does Zapper's last post bear great similarity to this page:
Do you know where Zz works ? Since he his a physicist living in Chicago, IL :rolleyes:
 
  • #22
BobG said:
He's wearing the same suit and tie in this picture: http://www.historyplace.com/specials/calendar/docs-pix/enrico-fermi.jpg

Did he own any other suits?

Was he like Hari Seldon and owned an entire closet of the exact same suit?

Strangely enough, I remember attending a seminar many years ago, and someone had an anecdote of Fermi (that he also heard from another person who was Fermi's contemporary) that Fermi did own roughly clothings of the same type. Of course, this being 2nd or even 3rd hand info, one shouldn't put too much authenticity on it.

Zz.
 
  • #23
I think he made a simple mistake. Why? Because claiming he was "having a little fun" by writing an equation improperly on purpose is an insult to the man. You're basically calling him a loser for being amused by something like that.
 
  • #24
WarPhalange said:
claiming he was "having a little fun" by writing an equation improperly on purpose is an insult to the man.
IMHO, you don't realize that this just cannot be a mistake, because it is too trivial. There is a physical meaning to combinations such as \hbar c and Fermi knew that very, very well. :smile:
 
  • #25
It could be Fermi's way of dealing with the press. I've seen professors or scientists interviewed, and a reporter or photographer (i.e. journalist) asks the professor to write some equation (anything) on the board - not that the journalist would necessarily understand it or whether it was right or wrong. The journalist is just interested in something that 'looks scientific'. :rolleyes:

I wonder how many times Albert Einstein was asked to write E = mc2.
 
  • #26
WarPhalange said:
You're basically calling him a loser for being amused by something like that.
It's better than calling him a loser for getting a simple and well known equation wrong.
 
Last edited:
  • #27
My professors make mistakes on the board daily. I guess they're all losers. Do you want to tell them that or should I?
 
  • #28
WarPhalange said:
My professors make mistakes on the board daily. I guess they're all losers. Do you want to tell them that or should I?
Lots of professors are amused by things that don't amuse you.
 
  • #29
Hay guiz! I rote pi = 7 on the board! ISN'T THAT A HOOT?
 
  • #30
WarPhalange said:
Hay guiz! I rote pi = 7 on the board! ISN'T THAT A HOOT?

My math teacher was upset about a slow student on the board once. The poor fellow was stuck on \frac{\sin\theta}{\cos\theta}.
The teacher, instead of hinting towards tangent, simplified it to \frac{\text{in}}{\text{co}}
It was the first time in my life I really saw somebody going :bugeye:
The large majority of the class was :smile:
It had been more than 5 five years since we were all supposed to know about tangent.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top