What is Information? Simplest Answer

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Padraic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Information
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of information, particularly in the context of physics and its implications in various theories, including black holes and quantum mechanics. Participants explore definitions, interpretations, and the nature of information, touching on both theoretical and practical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference the idea that information cannot be lost, with discussions around black holes and the notion that information may be stored outside the event horizon.
  • There is a proposal that physical information can be represented at the quantum level, with examples such as spin states and their measurement affecting the information contained.
  • One participant questions whether physical information is limited to quantum phenomena or if it extends to macroscopic events, suggesting that information might be destroyed at our level but could still be retrievable under certain conditions.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of information loss in black holes as a transition from a pure state to a mixed state, linking it to entropy and non-unitary evolution.
  • Discussion includes the idea that information should reduce uncertainty about possible answers, with references to entropy in communication and the implications of erasure in information processing.
  • Some participants mention the Unruh Effect and how different observers may perceive information differently based on their local conditions, emphasizing the locality of information in preserving causality.
  • There is mention of the wave function in quantum mechanics and ongoing debates about its interpretation, questioning whether it represents a physical entity or merely our knowledge of a system.
  • Anecdotal evidence is presented regarding slime molds and their information processing capabilities, suggesting a broader definition of information beyond traditional physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the nature of information, with no clear consensus reached. There are competing interpretations of how information functions in physical systems, particularly in relation to black holes and quantum mechanics.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in the discussion include varying definitions of information, the complexity of quantum states, and the implications of entropy that remain unresolved. The relationship between information and uncertainty is also a recurring theme that lacks a definitive conclusion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring foundational concepts in physics, particularly in quantum mechanics, black hole physics, and information theory. It may also appeal to individuals curious about the philosophical implications of information in scientific contexts.

  • #31
aimforclarity said:
im not sure that's any better. just because 200 years ago we could not "point to" or manipulate say cooper pairs or atoms, doesn't mean they don't exist and don't have an effect.
You can point to what you mean by cooper pairs or atoms or photons or electrons. All of these terms have real physical referents. Wrt some terms in fundamental physics there are only formal referents. Wrt some terms there are real physical instrumental referents.

But information is just data. That is, information refers to recorded and manipulable, interpretable, instrumental results. Just my two cents.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
At the risk of being controversial, I'll just say that until we fully understand consciousness, we will not fully understand what information is, either. I'm thinking of specific potential traits to consciousness that seem to allow the non-local exchange of "information". I'll go ahead and say the "dirty" words - psychic ability.

You can argue all you want there is no valid evidence it is a reality, but that is in no way decidedly true at this point.

Some noted physicsts like Michio Kaku have recently said an open mind is needed based on results from current laboratory testing. Even Carl Sagan, who said he doubted positive test results in the end, still thought it was worthy of investigation:

"At the time of this writing there are three claims in the ESP field which, in my opinion, deserve serious study: (1) that by thought alone humans can effect random number generators in computers; (2) that people under mild sensory deprivation can receive thoughts or images projected at them; (3) that young children sometimes report the details of a previous life, which upon checking turn out to be accurate and which they could not have known about in any other way than reincarnation."

Based on current findings, psychic ability, or information exchange via consciousness, appears to be non-local, and does not seem to favor a preferred direction in time.

If any of this turns out to be decidedly factual, it adds a whole 'nother dimension to the question, "what is information?". Ignoring it won't make it go away either.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K