What is meant by the following 2 statements?

  • Thread starter M. next
  • Start date
In summary, the concept of accelerated observers allows for the existence of holographic screens throughout space. The emergence of holographic direction is accompanied by redshifts and a coarse-graining procedure. Verlinde's model suggests that the physics of a region can be derived from physics on a bordering surface. This theory has been widely discussed online, with Sabine Hossenfelder providing helpful notes and a short discussion available.
  • #1
M. next
382
0
Thinking about accelerated observers, one can in principle locate holographic screens everywhere in space?

Emergence of holographic direction is accompanied by redshifts and coarse-graining procedure?

Reference: arXiv: 1001.0785v1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Verlinde is assuming that the physics of a region is actually derived from physics on a surface, or "screen", bordering that region. Well, it's a model. He's hoping that gravity falls out of this picture like the extra space dimension does.

This paper has been copiously discussed online.

Sabine Hossenfelder has a set of notes that may help you make sense of the paper.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.1015

...and a short discussion here:
http://backreaction.blogspot.co.nz/2010/03/gravity-is-entropy-is-gravity-is.html
 

1. What is meant by the statement "cause and effect"?

Cause and effect refers to the relationship between events or actions, where one event (the cause) leads to another event (the effect). This principle is commonly used in scientific research to explain the relationship between variables and their outcomes.

2. How does the concept of "control group" relate to scientific experiments?

A control group is a group in an experiment that does not receive the treatment or intervention being studied. This group serves as a baseline for comparison to the group that does receive the treatment. By having a control group, scientists can determine if the observed effects are a result of the treatment or other external factors.

3. What is the difference between a hypothesis and a theory?

A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon, based on limited evidence. It is a tentative statement that can be tested and either supported or rejected. A theory, on the other hand, is a well-established explanation for a natural phenomenon that has been extensively tested and supported by multiple lines of evidence. A theory is considered a higher level of understanding compared to a hypothesis.

4. How do scientists ensure the validity of their research?

Scientists use various methods to ensure the validity of their research, such as controlling variables, using rigorous experimental designs, and replicating their experiments. They also use statistical analysis to determine the significance of their findings and peer review to receive feedback and critique from other experts in the field.

5. What is the importance of peer review in scientific research?

Peer review is a crucial aspect of the scientific process as it allows for the evaluation of research by other experts in the field. This process helps to ensure the accuracy, validity, and reliability of research findings. It also allows for constructive criticism and feedback, which can lead to improvements in the research and its implications.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
0
Views
976
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
18
Views
8K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
72
Views
5K
Back
Top