B What is Olbers' Paradox and how does it relate to the universe's structure?

AI Thread Summary
Olbers' Paradox explores why the night sky is dark despite the vast number of stars in an infinite universe. The discussion highlights the relationship between a star's brightness, its surface area, and the distribution of stars in a spherical shell. The confusion arises from the use of the same variable 'r' for both the radius of the shell and the average radius of stars, which complicates the integration of luminosity. It is clarified that energy from a star spreads over a sphere with radius equal to the distance from the star, supporting the paradox's conclusion that total luminosity diverges to infinity in a static universe. Ultimately, the discussion resolves the confusion about the variables used in the calculations.
alejandromeira
Messages
82
Reaction score
15
I'm beginning to study the Matt Roots book Introduction to Cosmology and in the section 1.3 Olbers' Paradox he writes:
"If the surface area of an average star is A, then its brightness is B=L/A. The sun may be taken to be such an average star, mainly because we know it so well.
The number of stars in a spherical shell of radius r and thickness dr is then ##4\pi r²ndr##. Their total radiation as observed at the origin of a static universe of infinite extent is then found by integrating the spherical shells from 0 to ##\infty##:"
$$\int_{0}^\infty 4\pi r^2nBdr = \int_{0}^\infty nLdr = \infty$$
______________________________________________

I suppose that he use ##B=\frac{L}{4\pi r^2} ## for obtain the second integral, but r is the radius of the shell not the average radius of the stars. I'm a little bit confused whit that.

Of course if the Universe is infinite and the integration runs from 0 to infinity the total luminosity must be infinity.

My doubt is about the use of r above, in the radius of shell and also the same letter for the radius of a star... and then vanishing...:oldconfused::oldconfused::oldconfused: I'm a little bit confused.

 
Space news on Phys.org
##A## should be the area of a sphere with radius equal to the distance to the star. This is because the energy flux from the star is assumed to be evenly spread over that sphere.
 
Ok. it is understood. Also just after your answer I was thinking that the energy that we receive from a star a distance r, must be spreaded in a sphere of radius r.
Ok thanks a lot! :oldsmile::oldsmile: Thread solved.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top