What is Peter's current age in this age problem?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Age
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the ages of three individuals: John, Peter, and Alice. Participants are attempting to set up equations based on the relationships between their ages and to determine Peter's current age. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and problem-solving related to age problems.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes an initial setup of equations based on the relationships: John is twice as old as Peter, Peter is 5 years older than Alice, and in 5 years, John will be three times as old as Alice.
  • Another participant challenges the initial equations, suggesting a different formulation using variables for each person's age and arriving at a conclusion that Peter is 5 years old.
  • A later reply expresses confusion about the initial setup and acknowledges a mistake in understanding the problem, reiterating that Peter is 5 years old based on the corrected equations.
  • Another participant critiques the initial approach, emphasizing the need to define variables clearly and providing a detailed breakdown of the equations leading to the conclusion that Peter is also 5 years old.
  • One participant introduces an alternative interpretation of the problem, suggesting that if "in 5 years" refers to John's age being three times Alice's current age, it leads to a different conclusion where Peter would be 20 years old.
  • Another participant humorously notes that the alternative interpretation may not hold in the following year, implying a potential flaw in that reasoning.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that Peter's age can be calculated as 5 years based on the initial interpretation of the problem. However, there is disagreement regarding the interpretation of the phrase "in 5 years," which leads to a competing view that suggests Peter could also be 20 years old under a different interpretation.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reveals limitations in the clarity of the problem statement and the assumptions made about the relationships between the ages. The different interpretations of the phrase "in 5 years" contribute to the unresolved nature of the problem.

mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
John is twice as old as his friend Peter. Peter is 5 years older than Alice. In 5 years, John will be three times as old as Alice. How old is Peter now?

Set up:

John = 2(x + 5)

Peter = x + 5

Alice = x

2(x + 5 + 5) = 3(x + 5)

Is this the correct equation?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
To be honest I don't understand how you arrived at that last equation but it doesn't give the correct result for Alice's age.

Try this:

Let John be J years old, let Peter be P years old and let Alice be A years old. Then from the given information

1) J = 2P
2) P = A + 5
3) J + 5 = 3(A + 5)

Use 1) and 2) to get 3) in terms of P:

2P + 5 = 3P $\implies$ P = 5

So Peter is 5 years old, John is 10 and Alice is a newborn!
 
greg1313 said:
To be honest I don't understand how you arrived at that last equation but it doesn't give the correct result for Alice's age.

Try this:

Let John be J years old, let Peter be P years old and let Alice be A years old. Then from the given information

1) J = 2P
2) P = A + 5
3) J + 5 = 3(A + 5)

Use 1) and 2) to get 3) in terms of P:

2P + 5 = 3P $\implies$ P = 5

So Peter is 5 years old, John is 10 and Alice is a newborn!

My original equation was 2x + 5 = 3x. For some reason, it did not makes sense. I often rush through applications thinking the problem has been completely understood.
 
RTCNTC said:
My original equation was 2x + 5 = 3x. For some reason, it did not makes sense. I often rush through applications thinking the problem has been completely understood.

Yeah now the equation is correct. But i am still wondering it would give right answer.
 
"John is twice as old as his friend Peter. Peter is 5 years older than Alice. In 5 years, John will be three times as old as Alice. How old is Peter now?

Set up:

John = 2(x + 5)

Peter = x + 5

Alice = x

2(x + 5 + 5) = 3(x + 5)

Is this the correct equation?"


In the first place, "John", "Peter", and "Alice" are names, not numbers and it makes no sense to set them equal to "2(x+ 5)" "x+ 5", and "x"- especially since you have not said what "x" represents.

If you say "let x, y, and z be John's age, Peter's age, and Alice's age, respectively" then it makes sense to say
1) x= 2y (from "John is twice as old as his friend Peter").

2) y= z+ 5 (from "Peter is 5 years older than Alice").

The third condition is a little more complicated because it talks about "in five years". In five years, John's age will be x+ 5 and Alice's age will be z+ 5. Saying "In 5 years, John will be three times as old as Alice" gives
3) x+ 5= 3(z+ 5).

Since we are specifically asked to find Peter's age, y, I would use (1) x= 2y to write the (3) x+ 5= 3(z+ 5) as 2y+ 5= 3(z+ 5). That is equivalent to 2y+ 5= 3z+ 15 or 2y= 3z+ 10. We also have (2)y= z+ 5, so that z= y- 5 and then 2y= 3(y- 5)+ 10= 3y- 15+ 10= 3y- 5. From 2y= 3y- 5, y= 5. Peter is 5 years old.

Though it is not asked, John is twice as old, 10 years old. Alice's age is apparently 0 meaning, I presume, that she is a new born. These numbers, 10, 5, and 0 fit all of the information:
"John is twice as old as his friend Peter": 10= 2(5).
"Peter is 5 years older than Alice": 5= 0+ 5.
"In five years, John's age will be three times as old as Alice". Since John is 10, in five years, he will be 15. In five years, Alice will be 5 and 15= 3(5)".
 
IF we were to interpret "In 5 years, John will be three times as old as Alice" to mean that, in 5 years, John will be three times as old as Alice is now" (which I did not before because it seems a strange interpretation) then our three equations would be:
x= 2y
y= z+ 5
x+ 5= 3z.

Now, since x= 2y, x+ 5= 2y+ 5= 3z so 2y= 3z- 5. Since y= z+ 5, z= y- 5 so 2y= 3z- 5= 3(y- 5)- 5= 3y- 20. Then y=20. In this interpretation, Peter is 20 years old. Then "x= 2y" becomes x= 40 so John is 40 years old and y= z+ 5 becomes 20= z+ 5 so Alice is z= 20- 5= 15 years old. Quite a difference!
 
Hey Halls, that won't work next year :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K