Graduate What is primordial non gaussianity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Avi Nandi
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Primordial non-Gaussianity refers to the non-Gaussian distribution observed in the temperature anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). This phenomenon is discussed in detail in the paper "Detection of primordial non-Gaussianity (fNL) in the WMAP 3-year data at above 99.5% confidence" (https://arxiv.org/abs/0712.1148). The statistical properties of temperature variations in the CMB can deviate from Gaussianity, leading to correlated amplitudes and distributions with fatter tails. Current models predict no evidence of such deviations, as confirmed by the study "https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.01592".

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation
  • Familiarity with statistical distributions, particularly Gaussian and non-Gaussian distributions
  • Knowledge of correlation functions in statistical analysis
  • Basic principles of inflationary cosmology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of non-Gaussianity in inflationary models
  • Study the two-point correlation function and its applications in CMB analysis
  • Explore advanced statistical methods for analyzing non-Gaussian distributions
  • Review recent findings on primordial non-Gaussianity from the latest CMB data
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and researchers in theoretical physics who are interested in the statistical properties of the cosmic microwave background and the implications of inflationary models on cosmic structure formation.

Avi Nandi
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Can anyone give an idea about primordial non gaussianity in a popular way??
 
Space news on Phys.org
Where did you see this expression, or did you make it up?
 
Primordial non-Gaussianity is simply a term fo the non Guassian distribution detected in the temperature anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background. One of the better known discussions of this phenomenon is probably https://arxiv.org/abs/0712.1148, Detection of primordial non-Gaussianity (fNL) in the WMAP 3-year data at above 99.5% confidence.
 
Avi Nandi said:
Can anyone give an idea about primordial non gaussianity in a popular way??
The super short version is that it's all about the statistical properties of the temperature variations in the CMB.

Those temperature variations are sound waves, and at each frequency and direction of motion, if they are Gaussian, the amplitude of the resulting wave is drawn from an independent Gaussian distribution (also known as a Normal distribution). Deviations from this strict Gaussianity come in two ways:
1. The amplitudes of the waves can be correlated with one another.
2. The distribution of amplitudes differs from a Gaussian distribution (typically having fatter tails, meaning large deviations are more frequent than expected from a pure Gaussian).

The benefit of having Gaussian-distributed waves is that they can be perfectly-described by what is known as the two-point correlation function (which is the statistical variance between two points as a function of distance between the two points, independent of direction). This fact has a lot of really neat mathematical properties which make understanding the statistics of the CMB really easy. It means, for example, that all of the information about the temperature variation of the CMB is encoded in its power spectrum.

But what if this assumption isn't the case? Lots of more complex inflation models predict significant deviations from Gaussian behavior. These deviations can become far more challenging to investigate, just due to the more complex mathematics involved. So far, there is no evidence of deviation from Gaussianity:
https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.01592
 
Thanks Chronos and Kimbyd.
 
I always thought it was odd that we know dark energy expands our universe, and that we know it has been increasing over time, yet no one ever expressed a "true" size of the universe (not "observable" universe, the ENTIRE universe) by just reversing the process of expansion based on our understanding of its rate through history, to the point where everything would've been in an extremely small region. The more I've looked into it recently, I've come to find that it is due to that "inflation"...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
1K