What is quantum field theory and why was it developed?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter protonman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qft
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on quantum field theory (QFT), its development, and its relationship to quantum mechanics. Participants explore the historical context of QFT, its foundational concepts, and the mathematical complexities involved in field theories compared to particle theories.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants describe quantum field theory as a framework where fields are the primary variables, and particles are seen as quanta of these fields.
  • Historical context is provided, noting that quantum electrodynamics (QED) was the first fully developed quantum field theory, emerging from challenges like the Lamb shift observed in hydrogen spectra.
  • There are discussions about the transition from particle theories, which deal with finite numbers of particles, to field theories that involve infinitely many degrees of freedom and the implications of this shift.
  • Participants mention the mathematical complexities in field theory, such as the treatment of distributions and the need for regularization and renormalization to handle singularities.
  • Questions arise about the nature of quantization, with some participants suggesting it may relate to statistical analysis and expressing concerns about its applicability across different situations.
  • There is a mention of varying interpretations of quantization, with references to different theoretical frameworks like string theory and loop quantum gravity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature and implications of quantization, as well as the mathematical foundations of field theory. There is no consensus on the definitions or applications of quantization, indicating ongoing debate.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the mathematical treatment of field theories involves special cases and techniques that may not be universally applicable, highlighting the complexity and nuance in the discussion.

  • #61
selfAdjoint said:
No it doesn't. It is possible, if not necessary, to think of virtual particles as just mathematical terms in a power series, with no physical reality at all. Even the Casimir effect, which seems to show their reality, can be explained as an interaction with the plates.
i wonder what on Earth you were talking about before, silly
 

Similar threads

Graduate Consistency of Relativistic QM
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Graduate Why is Quantum Field Theory Local?
  • · Replies 182 ·
7
Replies
182
Views
16K
Graduate Is It Known For Sure Infinites In QFT Are Caused Using a Continuum?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
914
Graduate Importance of Densities in QFT
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Graduate Eigenstates of the Klein Gordon Field Operator
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Graduate Multiparticle Relativistic Quantum Mechanics in an external potential
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
High School Quantum Field Theory As Simple As Possible
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Graduate Physical properties of the vacuum in GR vs. QFT
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
Undergrad Why is m_j not a good quantum number in strong-field Zeeman effect?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Graduate Measurement in QFT: Mapping Fields to Theory's Math Formalism
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K