What is silanol and what could it be used for?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Q_Goest
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the chemical compound silanol, its production from organosilanes, and potential applications, particularly in hydrogen generation. Participants explore the implications of using silanol in energy production and the safety concerns associated with related compounds.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants describe the process of converting organosilanes to silanol and the concurrent production of hydrogen, noting the efficiency of this reaction.
  • There is a discussion about the economic viability of producing organosilanes and silanol in large quantities, with some expressing skepticism about current market demand.
  • One participant questions the practicality of using hydrogen in the synthesis of organosilanes, suggesting it diminishes the interest in the process.
  • Several participants engage in clarifying the chemical reactions involved, with some correcting earlier statements about the amounts of hydrogen produced and the nature of silane versus silanol.
  • Concerns are raised about the safety of using silane, particularly its flammability, and whether there are safer alternatives for hydrogen storage and production.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the claims of free energy or significant efficiency gains, arguing that the energy costs of producing starting materials must be considered.
  • There is a mention of the broader implications for hydrogen storage and the potential for this method to contribute to a hydrogen economy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the economic viability of silanol production or the safety of using silane. Multiple competing views exist regarding the practicality and implications of the discussed chemical processes.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the economic and safety aspects of using silanol and silane, as well as the energy inputs required for the synthesis of starting materials. The discussion reflects ongoing uncertainty about the feasibility of large-scale applications.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those involved in chemical engineering, energy production, and hydrogen fuel research, as well as individuals exploring the safety and economic implications of new chemical processes.

Q_Goest
Science Advisor
Messages
3,014
Reaction score
42
Interesting advancement in the creation of hydrogen from water. What is silanol and what are the uses?

Abu-Omar's team took a compound based on rhenium, a comparatively rare metal often obtained while mining copper, and added it to the organosilane in the presence of water. Over the course of an hour, the organosilane changed completely into silanol, leaving the water and rhenium catalyst unchanged. But the team also noticed there was a gas bubbling from the mixture.

"It turned out to be pure hydrogen," Abu-Omar said. "The reaction is not only efficient at creating silanol, but it also generates hydrogen at a high rate in proportion to the amount of water."

The team estimates that about 7 gallons each of water and organosilane could combine to produce 6 1/2 pounds of hydrogen, which could power a car for approximately 240 miles.

"The big question is, of course, whether it would be economically viable to create organosilane fuels in the quantities necessary to power a world full of cars," Abu-Omar said. "As of right now, there simply isn't enough demand to make more than small volumes of this liquid, and while it's a relatively easy process, it's not dirt cheap either."

But, Abu-Omar speculated, producing organosilanes in larger quantities would bring the price down, and the byproduct – silanol – also could be recycled or sold to lessen the overall cost.

"On today's chemical market, silanol is even more expensive than organosilanes are, but their value would of course decline as well if there were suddenly millions of gallons of them on the market," he said. "These are the sorts of questions that economists would have to look at, and we have other questions of our own, such as whether these reactions can be carried out on naturally occurring hydrogen sources."

Read it here:
http://pda.physorg.com/lofi-news-hydrogen-water-said_6137.html
and here:
http://news.uns.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/2005/050831.AbuOmar.hydrogen.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Isn't H2 used to synthesize the organosilanes in the first place? :rolleyes:
 
No idea, rach'. Fill me in, I'm not a chemist. I'm interested in the hydrogen so if it takes hydrogen to make this stuff, it seems a whole lot less interesting.
 
Silane is like methane, but it has silicon instead of carbon.
Silanol is silicon alcohols like Si-OH

As rach said, you need hydrogen to make silane.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silane
 
Edit: I'm wrong!

I think excesss hydrogen is in fact produced:
...[/color]
SiH4 + 3H20 -->SiH(OH)3 + 3H2

With an extra mole of H2 for each mole of SiH4 (comes from the H2O).

edit #2: egregious typo
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Link to the abstract & paper (J. Am. Chem. Soc.):
http://pubs.acs.org/cgi-bin/sample.cgi/jacsat/2005/127/i34/abs/ja053860u.html

Interesting read (for those who have access). In principle you can recycle part of the H2 to regenerate the organosilane, and you'd only consume water.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think excesss hydrogen is in fact produced:
...
SiH2 + 3H20 -->SiH(OH)3 + 3H2
Rach, would this reaction be
SiH2 + 3H20 -->SiH(OH)3 + 2H2
? ? ?

I assume this is in the presence of the catalyst rhenium, is that correct?

The reaction he gives in http://pubs.acs.org/cgi-bin/sample.cgi/jacsat/2005/127/i34/html/ja053860u.html" also gives a R subscript 4-x. What does that mean?

Is SiH2 silane? Abu-Omar talks about organosilane, is there any difference?

It sounds as if he's proposing a storage method as opposed to a source of hydrogen which is where I must have gotten confused. From the article Rash' posted:
Interest in hydrogen utilization as a fuel has intensified recently because its use in fuel cells affords water and heat as the only byproducts, and the prospects of a future hydrogen economy.1 The two key areas in need of research development are related to hydrogen sources and storage.1 While the source of hydrogen constitutes a significant scientific challenge, addressing issues of hydrogen storage, transport, and delivery is equally important. None of the current hydrogen storage options, liquefied or high-pressure H2 gas, metal hydrides, etc., satisfy criteria of size, cost, kinetics, and safety for use in transportation.
Some of the other articles I've read discuss this method of hydrogen generation on par with electrolyzing water and reforming methane to produce hydrogen, but those reactions are intended to produce hydrogen, not as a storage means. Regardless, it sounds as if he's proposing a method of storing 6% by weight hydrogen under ambient temperature and pressure which is extremely interesting to the hydrogen economy. That's about the break point we're looking for.

If SiH2 is silane though, that could be particularly nasty since it ignites in the presence of air.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
rachmaninoff said:
I think excesss hydrogen is in fact produced:
...[/color]
SiH2 + 3H20 -->SiH(OH)3 + 3H2
The problem is that silane is SiH4, not SiH2. All 4 of those hydrogens come from HCl, which is made from Cl2 and H2.

What must be remembered is that you can't get something for nothing. If it seems like the extra hydrogen is a net gain coming from water, it's because your starting materials (Si, H2, and Cl2) were made using a lot of energy, and all of that energy eventually traces back to power made using conventional means (oil, nuclear, wind, whatever). If this idea is being pitched as another free energy type idea, it's not impressive by a long shot. If it's an energy storage idea, it's basically just another design for a fuel cell, aka batteries.
 
ShawnD said:
The problem is that silane is SiH4, not SiH2. All 4 of those hydrogens come from HCl, which is made from Cl2 and H2. .

Sorry about that... fell asleep at the keyboard or something.
 
  • #10
ShawnD said:
What must be remembered is that you can't get something for nothing. If it seems like the extra hydrogen is a net gain coming from water, it's because your starting materials (Si, H2, and Cl2) were made using a lot of energy, and all of that energy eventually traces back to power made using conventional means (oil, nuclear, wind, whatever). If this idea is being pitched as another free energy type idea, it's not impressive by a long shot. If it's an energy storage idea, it's basically just another design for a fuel cell, aka batteries.

It's none of these. It merely demonstrates a particular catalytic method to get hydrogen from water; it doesn't much of a purpose, that's why I've been using the word "hype" so much. Especially when the author gets really speculative and suggests catalysts could liberate H2 from hydrocarbons in landfills. :confused:

Q - organosilanes are in general compounds with both C-H bonds and Si-H bonds, such as (CH3)3SiH.
 
  • #11
Thanks for the feedback Rach and Shawn.

Also, thanks for clarifying the reaction, Rach.

Wow, I can't believe he's suggesting using silane as a reactant. Way too dangerous for practical purposes on fuel cell vehicles. The company I work for installed a silane distribution hub about 6 or 8 years ago and I remember hearing that even the tiniest leaks from such things as cylinder valves instantly ignited. Not good...

Do you think there is any way of getting around the issue of using silane or other dangerous gasses? Do the byproducts of the reaction present any safety hazard?
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
20K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
32K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
26K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K