What is susceptibility in physics?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Susceptibility
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 21K views
Messages
19,946
Reaction score
11,035
Definition/Summary

Susceptibility is a property of material. In a vacuum it is zero.

Susceptibility is an operator (generally a tensor), converting one vector field to another. It is dimensionless.

Electric susceptibility [itex]\chi_e[/itex] is a measure of the ease of polarisation of a material.

Magnetic susceptibility [itex]\chi_m[/itex] is a measure of the strengthening of a magnetic field in the presence of a material.

Diamagnetic material has negative magnetic susceptibility, and so weakens a magnetic field.

Equations

Electric susceptibility [itex]\chi_e[/itex] and magnetic susceptibility [itex]\chi_m[/itex] are the operators which convert the electric field and the magnetic intensity field, [itex]\varepsilon_0\mathbf{E}[/itex] and [itex]\mathbf{H}[/itex] ([itex]not[/itex] the magnetic field [itex]\mathbf{B}[/itex]), respectively, to the polarisation and magnetisation fields [itex]\mathbf{P}[/itex] and [itex]\mathbf{M}[/itex]:

[tex]\mathbf{P}\ = \chi_e\,\varepsilon_0\,\mathbf{E}[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{M}\ = \chi_m\,\mathbf{H}\ = \frac{1}{\mu_0}\,\chi_m\,(\chi_m\,+\,1)^{-1}\,\mathbf{B}\ = \frac{1}{\mu_0}\,(1\,-\,(\chi_m\,+\,1)^{-1})\,\mathbf{B}[/tex]

Extended explanation

Bound charge and current:

Electric susceptibility converts [itex]\mathbf{E}[/itex], which acts on the total charge, to [itex]\mathbf{P}[/itex], which acts only on bound charge (charge which can move only locally within a material).

Magnetic susceptibility converts [itex]\mathbf{H}[/itex], which acts on free current, to [itex]\mathbf{M}[/itex], which acts only on bound current (current in local loops within a material, such as of an electron "orbiting" a nucleus).

Relative permittivity [itex]\mathbf{\varepsilon_r}[/itex] and relative permeability [itex]\mathbf{\mu_r}[/itex]:

[tex]\mathbf{\varepsilon_r}\ =\ \mathbf{\chi_e}\ +\ 1[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{\mu_r}\ =\ \mathbf{\chi_m}\ -\ 1[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{D}\ =\ \varepsilon_0\,\mathbf{E}\ +\ \mathbf{P}\ =\ \varepsilon_0\,(1\,+\,\mathbf{\chi_e})\,\mathbf{E}\ =\ \mathbf{\varepsilon_r}\,\mathbf{E}[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{B}\ =\ \mu_0\,(\mathbf{H}\ +\ \mathbf{M})\ =\ \mu_0\,(1\,+\,\mathbf{\chi_m})\,\mathbf{H}\ =\ \mathbf{\mu_r}\,\mathbf{H}[/tex]

Note that the magnetic equations analogous to [itex]\mathbf{P}\ = \mathbf{\chi_e}\,\varepsilon_0\,\mathbf{E}[/itex] and [itex]\mathbf{D}\ =\ \mathbf{\varepsilon_r}\,\mathbf{E}[/itex] are [itex]\mathbf{M}\ = \frac{1}{\mu_0}\,(1\,-\,(\mathbf{\chi_m}\,+\,1)^{-1})\,\mathbf{B}[/itex] and [itex]\mathbf{H}\ =\ \mathbf{\mu_r}^{-1}\,\mathbf{B}[/itex]

In other words, the magnetic analogy of relative permittivity is the inverse of relative permeability, and the magnetic analogy of electric susceptibility is the inverse of a part of magnetic susceptibility.

Permittivity: [itex]\mathbf{\varepsilon}\ =\ \varepsilon_0\,\mathbf{\varepsilon_r}[/itex]

Permeability: [itex]\mathbf{\mu}\ =\ \mu_0\,\mathbf{\mu_r}[/itex]

Units:

Relative permittivity and relative permeability, like susceptibility, are dimensionless (they have no units).

Permittivity is measured in units of farad per metre ([itex]F.m^{-1}[/itex]).

Permeability is measured in units of henry per metre ([itex]H.m^{-1}[/itex]) or tesla.metre per amp or Newton per amp squared.

cgs (emu) values:

Some books which give values of susceptibility use cgs (emu) units for electromagnetism.

Although susceptibility has no units, there is still a dimensionless difference between cgs and SI values, a constant, [itex]4\pi[/itex]. To convert cgs values to SI, divide by [itex]4\pi[/itex] for electric susceptibility, and multiply by [itex]4\pi[/itex] for magnetic susceptibility.

Tensor nature of susceptibility:

For crystals and other non-isotropic material, susceptibility depends on the direction, and changes the direction, and therefore is represented by a tensor.

For isotropic material, susceptibility is the same in every direction, and [itex]\mathbf{P}[/itex] (or [itex]\mathbf{M}[/itex]) is in the same direction as [itex]\mathbf{E}[/itex] (or [itex]\mathbf{H}[/itex]):

[tex]\mathbf{P}\ = \varepsilon_0\,\chi_e\,\mathbf{E}[/tex]

where [itex]\chi_e[/itex] is a multiple of the unit tensor, and therefore is effectively a scalar:

[tex]P^i\ =\ \varepsilon_0\,\chi_e\,E^i[/tex]


Ordinary susceptibility is a tensor (a linear operator whose components form a 3x3 matrix) which converts one vector field to another:

[tex]P^i\ =\ \varepsilon_0\,\chi_{e\ j}^{\ i}\,E^j[/tex]

Second-order susceptibility is a tensor (a linear operator whose components form a 3x3x3 "three-dimensional matrix") which converts two copies of one vector field to another:

[tex]P^i\ =\ \varepsilon_0\,\chi_{e\ \ jk}^{(2)\,i}\,E^j\,E^k[/tex]

It is used in non-linear optics.

Susceptibility, being a tensor, is always linear in each of its components. The adjective "non-linear" refers to the presence of two (or more) copies of [itex]\bold{E}[/itex].

More generally, one can have:

[tex]P^i\ =\ \varepsilon_0\,\sum_{n\ =\ 1}^{\infty}\chi_{e\ \ \ j_1\cdots j_n}^{(n)\,i}\,E^{j_1}\cdots E^{j_n}[/tex]

* This entry is from our old Library feature. If you know who wrote it, please let us know so we can attribute a writer. Thanks!
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jared Edington
Physics news on Phys.org