What Is the Adjoint Representation of SU(2)?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the adjoint representation of the special unitary group SU(2) and the relationship between the ad and Ad operators. The user seeks clarification on the use of matrices g and g-1 in the context of the adjoint representation, specifically in the equation Ad(X) = gXg-1. Additionally, the user aims to demonstrate the connection between ad and Ad through matrix exponentiation, particularly in solving Ad(expX) = exp(ad(X)). The conversation highlights the complexities of calculating matrix exponentials for (3x3)-matrices and suggests starting with (2x2)-matrices for simplicity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lie groups and Lie algebras
  • Familiarity with matrix exponentiation techniques
  • Knowledge of the special unitary group SU(2)
  • Experience with calculating commutators in linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the adjoint representation in SU(2)
  • Learn about matrix exponentiation for (2x2)-matrices
  • Explore the relationship between Lie groups and their Lie algebras
  • Investigate the calculation of commutators in the context of Lie algebras
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, physicists, and students studying representation theory, particularly those interested in the properties of SU(2) and its applications in quantum mechanics and theoretical physics.

nigelscott
Messages
133
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


[/B]
I am looking at this document. http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/notes3.pdf

Homework Equations


[/B]
ad(x)y = [x,y]

Ad(X) = gXg-1

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I understand how ad(S1) and X is found but I don't understand what g and g-1 to use to find Ad(X). Also I need to show that ad and Ad are connected via matrix exponentiation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To be honest, I don't really want to read four pages to answer a possibly simple question, the more as I've already written two insight articles, which deal with ##SU(2)## representations. I worked out quite a few explicit formulas for expressions in certain bases. So maybe you'll find there what you are looking for (you can skip the first two sections).

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/journey-manifold-su2mathbbc-part/
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/journey-manifold-su2-part-ii/
 
Thanks. I worked through your paper and understand how you got to part 2 (12) and (13). The part 1 am stuck on now is solving Ad(expX) = exp(ad(X)) for the matrices you have calculated. When I try to calculate the matrix exponential I get strange results. Any pointers you could give would be of great help. Thanks again.
 
nigelscott said:
When I try to calculate the matrix exponential I get strange results. Any pointers you could give would be of great help.
It's not really funny to calculate the exponentials of ##(3\times 3)-##matrices and easy to make mistakes. I guess, that's why I haven't really seen it anywhere. I would start with ##(2\times 2)-##matrices and the Lie group of matrices of the form ##\begin{bmatrix}a&b\\0&0\end{bmatrix}## with ##a \neq 0## and the Lie algebra ##[X,Y]=Y## which is easier than with simple Lie groups which have entries on both sides of the diagonal. It's also the reason why I used the differentiation of curves in the Lie group to show the connection to its Lie algebra. Exponentiation is basically the way back, an integration.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K