What is the Angular Acceleration for a Rotating Computer Disk Drive?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular acceleration of a computer disk drive that starts from rest and has a constant angular acceleration. It is established that the drive takes 0.690 seconds to complete its second revolution, and the goal is to determine the time taken for the first revolution and the angular acceleration. Various equations of motion for rotational dynamics are applied, leading to the formulation of a quadratic equation to relate the times of the two revolutions. The participants clarify the correct application of angular displacement and acceleration formulas, ultimately deriving the necessary values. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately solving for both angular acceleration and the time for the first revolution.
PirateFan308
Messages
91
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A computer disk drive is turned on starting from rest and has constant angular acceleration.
If it took 0.690s for the drive to make its second complete revolution, how long did it take to make the first complete revolution?
What is the angular acceleration?

Homework Equations


w2 = w02+2\alpha∅

∅=w0t+(0.5)\alphat2

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm trying to first find the angular acceleration, and from there I can find out how long it took to make the first complete revolution.

First revolution:
w0=0 t=? \alpha=\alpha w=w ∅=2∏

Second revolution:
w0=w t=0.690s \alpha=\alpha ∅=2∏

Second revolution:

∅=w0t+(0.5)\alphat2
2∏ = w0(0.690)+(0.5)\alpha(0.690)2
\alpha=\frac{2∏-w0(0.69)}{(0.5)(0.69)^2}

First equation:
w2=w02+2\alpha(2∏)
(\frac{2∏-w0(0.69)}{(0.5)(0.69)^2})(\frac{2∏-w0(0.69)}{(0.5)(0.69)^2})=2\alpha(2∏)
I rearranged to get:
4∏2=\alpha((4∏(0.69)2)+(π(0.69)2)-((0.5)(0.69)2))
\alpha=5.45
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PirateFan308 said:
First revolution:
w0=0 t=? \alpha=\alpha w=w ∅=2∏

Second revolution:
w0=w t=0.690s \alpha=\alpha ∅=2∏

Second revolution:

∅=w0t+(0.5)\alphat2
2∏ = w0(0.690)+(0.5)\alpha(0.690)2
\alpha=\frac{2∏-w0(0.69)}{(0.5)(0.69)^2}

I agree up to this point.

First equation:
w2=w02+2\alpha(2∏)
(\frac{2∏-w0(0.69)}{(0.5)(0.69)^2})(\frac{2∏-w0(0.69)}{(0.5)(0.69)^2})=2\alpha(2∏)
I rearranged to get:
4∏2=\alpha((4∏(0.69)2)+(π(0.69)2)-((0.5)(0.69)2))
\alpha=5.45

Your "velocity-squared" equation is all right, and \omega_{0} = 0 . But doesn't that then lead to

\omega^{2} = 0^{2} + 4 \alpha \pi \Rightarrow \omega^{2} = 4 \pi \cdot \frac{2 \pi - \omega (0.69)}{(0.5)(0.69)^2} ,

with \omega being the angular speed at the start of the second revolution? (In fact, your expression in parentheses has units of rad/(sec2), so you can't mean to insert it into the first equation for \omega .)

(And I don't see a much tidier way of doing this, in view of the information given and the fact that there are two unknowns.)

BTW, don't forget to answer the first question about how long the first revolution took.
 
Last edited:
I figured out a couple of different ways to solve this. They both lead me to the same quadratic equation for t2/t1, where t1 is the time required for the first revolution, and t2 is the time required for the second revolution (which we know to be 0.69 s).

Method 1:

Angular displacement between t = 0 and t = t1:

\Delta \theta = \frac{1}{2}\alpha (\Delta t)^2 \Rightarrow 2 \pi = \frac{1}{2}\alpha t_1^2

\Rightarrow \alpha = \frac{4\pi}{t_1^2}

Angular displacement between t = 0 and t = t2:

4 \pi = \frac{1}{2}\alpha (t_1+t_2)^2

8 \pi = \frac{4\pi}{t_1^2} (t_1+t_2)^2

2 = \frac{t_1^2 + 2t_1t_2 + t_2^2}{t_1^2}

2 = 1 + 2\frac{t_2}{t_1} + \left(\frac{t_2}{t_1}\right)^2

Letting x = t2/t1, this becomes the quadratic equation:

x^2 + 2x - 1 = 0

which you can solve.

Method 2:

Angular displacement between t = 0 and t = t1:

\Delta \theta = \frac{1}{2}\alpha (\Delta t)^2 \Rightarrow 2 \pi = \frac{1}{2}\alpha t_1^2

\Rightarrow \alpha = \frac{4\pi}{t_1^2}

Angular displacement between t = t1 and t = t2:

2\pi = \omega_1 t_2 + \frac{1}{2}\alpha t_2^2

But \omega_1 (the speed at the end of the first revolution) is just \alpha t_1. Also, if you substitute in the expression for alpha, you get:

2\pi = 4\pi \frac{t_2}{t_1} + 2\pi \frac{t_2^2}{t_1^2}

1 = 2x + x^2

Same quadratic as before. Since you know t2 (it's given), once you solve for x, you have solved for t1. Discard the solution to the quadratic in which the ratio is negative.
 
Wow, thanks guys! That helped a lot!
 
One question, how did you format your equations so that they looked so much neater and easier to read?
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K