What Is the Approximation for the Roche Limit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicstudent_B
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Roche limit, specifically the approximation formula d=(9M/(4*pi*p))^1/3, where M is the mass of the primary body and p is the density of the secondary body. Participants are exploring the conditions under which this approximation holds, particularly in the context of gravitational forces acting on a test particle situated at a distance from the secondary body.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the balance of tidal forces and gravitational forces, with one attempting to set these forces equal to derive the distance d. There are questions about the correct application of gravitational force equations and the use of approximations in the calculations. The role of orbital motion and its impact on the forces involved is also questioned.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, sharing their attempts and seeking clarification on specific aspects of the equations involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the signs of forces and the need for additional equations related to angular velocity and density. There is an ongoing exploration of the assumptions being made, particularly regarding the position of the test particle and the nature of the forces acting on it.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information available and the methods they can use. There is an emphasis on understanding the relationships between mass, density, and gravitational forces in the context of the Roche limit.

physicstudent_B
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
phys.PNG

1. Homework Statement

Show that d=(9M/(4*pi*p))^1/3 is an approximation for the roche limit. Note that x/d <<1
with M = mass of the primary
p = density of the secondary
x= distance of a test particle from the center of the secondary (in part a) of the task one should give the motion equation for X. X is a particle that is situated at distance x from the center of the secondary (on a line that goes from the center of the secondary to the center of the primary)
m = mass of the secondary

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


In the critical point the tidal force excerted from the primary and the gravitational force that hold the secondary together are equal and therefore the secondary breaks. So I tried to put these forces equal and to solve the equation for d, but it did not work out.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi physicstudent_B, Welcome to Physics Forums.

Can you show us the details of what you tried and point out where you think it went wrong or failed?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: physicstudent_B
Thank you for your message and for welcoming me to the Physics Forum.
So the first part of this question was to write the equation of motion for X:
I think that there are two forces, who effect particle X: the gravitational force from the secondary FD and the gravitational force from the primary FO
FO+FD = mx * w2d (D is orbiting around O with constant velocity and D is not moving)
FO = (G*mx*M)/(d-x)^2
FD= (here I am not so sure, because obviously X is situated somewhere inside of D if I understood the question right, but from another exercise I remember a formula that you can use to calculate the gravitational force the Earth exerts on a body of mass m that is inside the Earth somewhere at distance r from the center of mass: F=mgr/R (R= radius of the Earth) --> so I tried to use this formula to express the force the primary exerts on the particle X :
FD=(mx*G*m*x) / R^3
Now I tried to put FO=FD and resolve for d, but I got stuck
I think I should use the binominal approximation for calculatin FO (so that 1(d-x)^2 = 1/d^2 * (1+x/d), also I think that I should express the mass in terms of volume (4/3*pi*r^3) * density, but I don't get close to the term I should get, so I wonder if there is something wrong with how I calculate the two forces.
 
You can assume that the small test mass is on the surface of the object. While it does not matter for the calculation, the object cannot fly away if it is inside.

Be careful with the signs. The gravitational forces point in opposite directions. If you want to add them as in your first equation one has to be negative (which one?).

In the first equation: The radius of the orbit of x is not d.

You are missing two equations:
w as function of the given parameters.
A formula relating m/R3 and the density.

Once you have those and fixed the sign issue and the radius, you should be able to solve for d.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: physicstudent_B
Thank you. So with the signs right it should be:
FO-FD= mx*w2*d
and the formula relating m/R3 and density would be m/R^3 = p * 4/3 * pi
I have not yet an idea for w as function of the given parameters.
And if X is on the surface of O, the x would be the same as the radius of O?
 
physicstudent_B said:
I have not yet an idea for w as function of the given parameters.
Your mass m is in a circular orbit around the bigger mass.
physicstudent_B said:
And if X is on the surface of O, the x would be the same as the radius of O?
Right.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: physicstudent_B
OK, w2=GMm/d3
Then I could solve for d using the equation of motion of the particle X.
But I did not yet completely understand: I thought that FO and FD would be the same at distance d, so that FO-FD=0, but that is obviously not the case?
 
You'll see if you can neglect the orbital motion later. You cannot just assume it to be negligible.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: physicstudent_B

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
335
Views
17K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K