MHB What is the area of rectangle ABCD?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Albert1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Rectangle
AI Thread Summary
To find the area of rectangle ABCD, given points E and F on sides BC and AB respectively, and the lengths BF = CE = 4 and BE = 2, one must analyze the geometric relationships and angles formed by the intersections of lines AE and CF. The condition that angle APC equals the sum of angles AEB and CFB suggests a specific configuration that can be used to derive the rectangle's dimensions. By applying geometric principles and the properties of rectangles, the area can be calculated. The solution involves determining the lengths of sides AB and BC based on the given segments. Ultimately, the area of rectangle ABCD can be expressed as the product of its length and width derived from these calculations.
Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
$Rectangle\,\,ABCD\,\,given\,\, point \,\,E,F \,\,on \,\,\overline {BC},\overline {AB}\,\,\, respectively$
$if \,\,\overline{BF}=\overline{CE}=4,\overline{BE}=2,point \,\, P \,\,is\,\, the \,\, intersection\,\ of\,\,\overline{AE}\,\,and\,\,\overline{CF},\,\, and \,\, \angle APC=\angle AEB+\angle CFB$
$please\,\,find \,\, the \,\, area \,\, of \,\, rectangle \,\,ABCD$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
My attempt:

View attachment 6288
Let
\[\alpha =\angle AEB\: \: \: and \: \: \: \beta =\angle CFB\]

Note, that

\[\angle APC = \angle FPE = \alpha +\beta\]

The quadrilateral, $BFPE$, has the angle sum:

\[90^{\circ}+2( \alpha +\beta )=360^{\circ}\]

Thus, $\alpha + \beta = 135^{\circ}$

$\alpha$ and $\beta$ are easily calculated:

\[\tan\beta =\frac{\overline{BC}}{\overline{BF}}=\frac{3}{2}\Rightarrow \: \: \beta =56,31^{\circ}\]

\[\alpha = 135^{\circ}-56,31^{\circ}=78,69^{\circ}\]

Finally, $FA$ is found:

\[\tan \alpha =\frac{4+\overline{FA}}{2}\Rightarrow \overline{FA}=6.\]

Thus, the rectangle, $ABCD$, has the area: $6 \cdot 10 = 60$.
 

Attachments

  • Area of rectangle ABCD.PNG
    Area of rectangle ABCD.PNG
    3.2 KB · Views: 116
lfdahl said:
My attempt:

Let
\[\alpha =\angle AEB\: \: \: and \: \: \: \beta =\angle CFB\]

Note, that

\[\angle APC = \angle FPE = \alpha +\beta\]

The quadrilateral, $BFPE$, has the angle sum:

\[90^{\circ}+2( \alpha +\beta )=360^{\circ}\]

Thus, $\alpha + \beta = 135^{\circ}$

$\alpha$ and $\beta$ are easily calculated:

\[\tan\beta =\frac{\overline{BC}}{\overline{BF}}=\frac{3}{2}\Rightarrow \: \: \beta =56,31^{\circ}\]

\[\alpha = 135^{\circ}-56,31^{\circ}=78,69^{\circ}\]

Finally, $FA$ is found:

\[\tan \alpha =\frac{4+\overline{FA}}{2}\Rightarrow \overline{FA}=6.\]

Thus, the rectangle, $ABCD$, has the area: $6 \cdot 10 = 60$.
Your answer is correct,thanks a lot .
But how do you get the value of $tan\,\alpha$ using a calculator ? if so try not
 
Here it is without aforementioned device (if such a device was actually used).

Using lfdahl's diagram and the result $\alpha+\beta=135^\circ$,

$$\tan(\alpha+\beta)=-1=\frac{\tan(\alpha)+\tan(\beta)}{1-\tan(\alpha)\tan(\beta)}=\frac{\tan(\alpha) + 3/2}{1-3\tan(\alpha)/2}\implies\tan(\alpha)=5$$

and the result follows.
 
Albert said:
Your answer is correct,thanks a lot .
But how do you get the value of $tan\,\alpha$ using a calculator ? if so try not
Without the use of a calculator:
\[\tan(\beta )=\frac{3}{2} \\\\ \tan(\alpha +\beta )= \tan(135^{\circ})=\tan(90^{\circ}+45^{\circ})=-1 \\\\ \tan(\alpha +\beta )=\frac{\tan(\alpha )+\tan(\beta )}{1-\tan(\alpha )\tan(\beta )}\Rightarrow \tan(\alpha )=5 \\\\ \tan(\alpha )=\frac{\overline{AB}}{2}\Rightarrow \overline{AB} = 10\]
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top