MHB What Is the Basis for the Kernel of the Differential Operator \(D^4-2D^3-3D^2\)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis Kernel
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
ok I am new to this basis of kernel and tried to understand some other posts on this but they were not 101 enough

Find the basis for kernel of the differential operator $D:C^\infty\rightarrow C^\infty$,
$D^4-2D^3-3D^2$

this can be factored into

$D^2(D-3)(D+1)$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
karush said:
ok I am new to this basis of kernel and tried to understand some other posts on this but they were not 101 enough

Find the basis for kernel of the differential operator $D:C^\infty\rightarrow C^\infty$,
$D^4-2D^3-3D^2$

this can be factored into

$D^2(D-3)(D+1)$
First, you need to work out what the question is asking for. The differential operator $D:C^\infty\rightarrow C^\infty$ take a smooth function $y = f(x)$ and differentiates it. The kernel of $D$ is the set of functions that it takes to zero, namely the constant functions. So a basis for the kernel of $D$ would consist of a single element, the constant function $1$.

But what the question is actually asking for is not the kernel of $D$, but the kernel of $D^4-2D^3-3D^2$. Using the factorisation $D^4-2D^3-3D^2 = D^2(D-3)(D+1)$ (and the fact that those factors commute with each other), what you need to do is to find the kernel of each separate factor.

For example, the kernel of $D-3$ consists of functions $y=f(x)$ such that $(D-3)y = 0$, in other words $\frac{dy}{dx} - 3y = 0$. The solution of that differential equation consists of multiples of $e^{3x}$, so a basis for the kernel of $D-3$ would be the function $e^{3x}$. Now do the same for the other two factors $D^2$ and $D+1$, to get a basis for $D^2(D-3)(D+1)$.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K