MHB What Is the Basis for the Kernel of the Differential Operator \(D^4-2D^3-3D^2\)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis Kernel
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
ok I am new to this basis of kernel and tried to understand some other posts on this but they were not 101 enough

Find the basis for kernel of the differential operator $D:C^\infty\rightarrow C^\infty$,
$D^4-2D^3-3D^2$

this can be factored into

$D^2(D-3)(D+1)$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
karush said:
ok I am new to this basis of kernel and tried to understand some other posts on this but they were not 101 enough

Find the basis for kernel of the differential operator $D:C^\infty\rightarrow C^\infty$,
$D^4-2D^3-3D^2$

this can be factored into

$D^2(D-3)(D+1)$
First, you need to work out what the question is asking for. The differential operator $D:C^\infty\rightarrow C^\infty$ take a smooth function $y = f(x)$ and differentiates it. The kernel of $D$ is the set of functions that it takes to zero, namely the constant functions. So a basis for the kernel of $D$ would consist of a single element, the constant function $1$.

But what the question is actually asking for is not the kernel of $D$, but the kernel of $D^4-2D^3-3D^2$. Using the factorisation $D^4-2D^3-3D^2 = D^2(D-3)(D+1)$ (and the fact that those factors commute with each other), what you need to do is to find the kernel of each separate factor.

For example, the kernel of $D-3$ consists of functions $y=f(x)$ such that $(D-3)y = 0$, in other words $\frac{dy}{dx} - 3y = 0$. The solution of that differential equation consists of multiples of $e^{3x}$, so a basis for the kernel of $D-3$ would be the function $e^{3x}$. Now do the same for the other two factors $D^2$ and $D+1$, to get a basis for $D^2(D-3)(D+1)$.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...

Similar threads

Back
Top