Studying What Is the Best Path to Learn Math?

  • Thread starter Thread starter John_Williams
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the best approach to teach math to a child at a 4th-grade level, sparked by a parent's desire to support their son's interest in math. Suggestions include starting with basic arithmetic and geometry, emphasizing the importance of foundational skills before advancing to Pre-Algebra or Algebra. It is noted that traditional school math often focuses on calculation rather than a deeper understanding of mathematical concepts, which can lead to boredom if children learn ahead of their peers. Resources like Open Stax are recommended for accessible learning materials, and there is a consensus that geometry can be a beneficial first step due to its practical applications. The conversation also highlights the differences in teaching methods over the years, suggesting that parents familiarize themselves with current educational materials used in schools to better assist their children.
John_Williams
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I was hoping I could get a good idea on the best "path" or "progression" to learn math starting from around a 4th grade level. My son has become very interested in math and wants me to get him some books and teach and help him when he gets stuck. That has inspired me to learn more maths as well. I was wondering what would be a good book for him to start. Pre-Algebra maybe? I don't really know what is before that so any tips on what a 4th grader would be able to do and maybe a book that would pique his interest. For me, I plan on getting a Calculus book (suggestions welcome on the best one to get) to refresh my calculus knowledge but then I am unsure what I should take on next. Thanks in advance for helping out some Maths enthusiasts!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Open Stax has a variety of freely available books:
https://openstax.org/subjects

I think they are meant to close the gap between all the different high schools and what is expected to know at colleges. But they are rather elementary, and I assume suited.

Just two things that should be considered:
If kids learn stuff ahead of what is taught in schools anyway, they might get bored at school and this could lead to the opposite effect.
Mathematics is rather different from what is taught at school. I like to say "school math is calculation, not math."

A possible first step that avoids those conflicts would be geometry: compass, ruler, and logic.
 
  • Like
Likes symbolipoint, hutchphd and berkeman
John_Williams said:
My son has become very interested in math and wants me to get him some books and teach and help him when he gets stuck.
Welcome to PF. That is great that your child is already interested in Math and STEM. :smile:

fresh_42 said:
Mathematics is rather different from what is taught at school. I like to say "school math is calculation, not math."
I think it's a bit worse than that, at least for basic math as taught to 6-16 year old students in the US. I believe that math is now taught to young people in schools with tricks and techniques different from the math techniques that we learned. And trying to teach a young student our old way of doing things can just confuse them when they try to do it the "school" way. I experienced that a little back 15 years ago when my kids were young, but apparently now it is much worse.

I'm not sure of the best way to handle this, but it may involve trying to get hold of some of the learning/teaching materials that will be used in your area schools when your child is in school. Do you have any contacts at your area schools?

1627141245486.png

https://www.understood.org/articles/en/9-new-math-problems-and-methods

https://www.parents.com/kids/educat...math-method-explained-for-millennial-parents/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Math
 
John_Williams said:
Pre-Algebra maybe? I don't really know what is before that so any tips on what a 4th grader would be able to do and maybe a b
"Pre-Algebra" can often be a weaker form of "Algebra 1". It is not a bad choice to give a bridge between General Mathematics and Algebra 1, but it is unnecessary for some students. Likely unnecessary for most students.

Books for before Pre-Algebra could be basic Arithmetic and topics instructing on whole numbers, fractions, signed numbers, decimals, percents, the very many numerous applied General and Consumer Mathematics including pictorial ways to represent numerical information. Look for some treatment of prime and composite numbers within books you try to evaluate. Also, books which instruct on common Geometry can be useful. The G.E.D. Mathematics books will typically these topics of instruction. Otherwise, I have no specific books names to recommend.

I prefer to suggest skipping Pre-Algebra. Once a student has understood and spent enough effort on Arithmetic and General Mathematics, even if he has not mastered it, he can go directly to Basic Beginning Algebra. You can find good old, USED books at library book sales for very low prices. Since you studied through Calculus in your college days, you will know what to look for when you examine these. A few useful authors of these books to help identify them are: Write & New, Larson; Larson & Hostetler, Aufman; Aufman & Barker. I cannot remember some others.
 
fresh_42 said:
Open Stax has a variety of freely available books:
https://openstax.org/subjects

I think they are meant to close the gap between all the different high schools and what is expected to know at colleges. But they are rather elementary, and I assume suited.

Just two things that should be considered:
If kids learn stuff ahead of what is taught in schools anyway, they might get bored at school and this could lead to the opposite effect.
Mathematics is rather different from what is taught at school. I like to say "school math is calculation, not math."

A possible first step that avoids those conflicts would be geometry: compass, ruler, and logic.
I do not completely agree with all of that but I like the posting anyway. Readers, use the passage for your own thinking the best ways you can. Additionally, "Geometry", the course, is one if not the only one which has a laboratory component to it (for Mathematics courses grades 1 through 12 in K-12 systems).
 
berkeman in post #3,

I had seen some strange and confusing instructional parts of some books in certain schools directly, several years ago. Only thing I can say is some crazy exercises shown without any meaningful motivation or identification of concept or skill to be learned.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Replies
71
Views
705
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top