What is the bijection between $\text{Hom}_K(W,U)$ and $S$?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris L T521
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on establishing a bijection between the set of homomorphisms from the vector space $W$ to $U$, denoted as $\text{Hom}_K(W,U)$, and the set $S$ of splittings of the short exact sequence defined by the linear maps $\psi: U \to V$ and $\phi: V \to W$. The short exact sequence is represented as \( 0 \rightarrow U \xrightarrow{\psi} V \xrightarrow{\phi} W \rightarrow 0 \). The key conclusion is that for every homomorphism in $\text{Hom}_K(W,U)$, there corresponds a unique splitting in $S$, confirming the existence of this bijection.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and linear maps
  • Familiarity with short exact sequences in linear algebra
  • Knowledge of the concept of homomorphisms in the context of vector spaces
  • Basic grasp of the properties of bijections in mathematical mappings
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of short exact sequences in linear algebra
  • Explore the concept of linear transformations and their representations
  • Learn about the implications of the splitting lemma in vector spaces
  • Investigate the role of homomorphisms in the context of module theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in linear algebra, algebraic structures, and anyone studying the properties of vector spaces and linear mappings.

Chris L T521
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
913
Reaction score
0
Here's this week's problem.

-----

Problem: Let $U$, $V$, and $W$ be three left $K$-vector spaces, and $\psi$, $\phi$ linear maps, fitting into a short exact sequence:
\[ 0\rightarrow U \xrightarrow{\psi} V \xrightarrow{\phi} W \rightarrow 0.\]
Define
\[S = \{\sigma \in \text{Hom}_K(W,V) : \phi \circ \sigma = \text{Id}_W\}.\]
(An element of S is called a splitting of the short exact sequence). Prove that there exists a bijection from $\text{Hom}_K(W,U)$ to $S$.

-----

 
Physics news on Phys.org
No one answered this week's question. You can find my solution below.

Since the sequence\[0\rightarrow U \xrightarrow{\psi} V \xrightarrow{\phi} W \rightarrow 0\]
is exact, then we have
\[V = \ker\ \phi \oplus F,\]
where $F \cong W$. We denote the projections as $p_1 : V \rightarrow \ker\ \phi$ and $p_2 : V \rightarrow F$. While $\psi$ is injective, then $\exists \varphi \in \text{Hom}_K (V, U)$ such that $\varphi\circ\psi = Id_U.$

Let $\alpha : W \rightarrow U$ be
\[\alpha = \varphi|_{\ker\ \phi} \circ p_1 \circ \sigma.\]
It is easy to see that $\varphi$, $p_1$ and $\sigma$ is $K$-linear, thus $\alpha \in \text{Hom}_K(W,U)$ and $\alpha$ is decided by $\sigma$ completely.

Let
\[h: S \rightarrow \text{Hom}_K(W,U);\ \ h(\sigma) = \varphi|_{\ker\
\phi} \circ p_1 \circ \sigma,\]
then $h$ is well-defined.

If $\exists \sigma_1, \sigma_2$ such that $h(\sigma_1) = h(\sigma_2)$, i.e.
\[\varphi|_{\ker\ \phi} \circ p_1 \circ \sigma_1 = \varphi|_{\ker\ \phi} \circ p_1 \circ \sigma_2.\]

Since $\varphi|_{\ker\ \phi} : \ker\ \phi \rightarrow U$ is an isomorphism, then
\[ (\psi \circ \varphi|_{\ker\ \phi}) \circ p_1
\circ \sigma_1 = (\psi \circ \varphi|_{\ker\ \phi}) \circ p_1 \circ
\sigma_2,\]
i.e. $p_1 \circ \sigma_1 = p_1 \circ \sigma_2.$Since $\sigma = (p_1\circ \sigma, p_2\circ \sigma)$, then
\[\sigma_1 - \sigma_2 = (p_1\circ (\sigma_1-\sigma_2), p_2\circ
(\sigma_1-\sigma_2)).\]
Therefore,
\[\phi\circ (\sigma_1 - \sigma_2) = \phi\circ p_2\circ (\sigma_1-\sigma_2).\]
i.e.
\[0 = \text{Id}_W - \text{Id}_W = \phi\circ p_2\circ (\sigma_1-\sigma_2).\]
Since $\phi\circ p_2 \circ (\sigma_1-\sigma_2) = \phi|_{F}\circ p_2 \circ (\sigma_1-\sigma_2)$ and $\phi|_{F}$ is injective, therefore $p_2 \circ (\sigma_1-\sigma_2) = 0$. Hence
\[(p_1\circ \sigma_1, p_2\circ \sigma_1) = (p_1\circ \sigma_2, p_2\circ \sigma_2).\]
i.e. $\sigma_1 = \sigma_2$. Now we have proved $h$ is injective.

Now $\forall \alpha \in \text{Hom}_k(W,U)$, let $\sigma = \psi \circ
\alpha$. Then
\[h(\sigma) = \varphi|_{\ker\ \phi} \circ p_1 \circ \sigma = \varphi|_{\ker\ \phi} \circ p_1 \circ \psi \circ \alpha.\]

Since $\psi \circ \alpha : \text{Hom}_K(W,\ker\ \phi)$, then
\[h(\sigma) = \varphi \circ \psi \circ \alpha = \text{Id}_U \circ \alpha = \alpha.\]
Therefore, $h$ is a surjective.

Combining both of the parts, we conclude that $h: S \rightarrow
\text{Hom}_K (W,U)$ is bijective.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K