What is the box in particle in a box?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mishima
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Particle
Click For Summary
The "box" in the particle in a box model is a theoretical construct representing a confined space with impenetrable walls, not directly analogous to energy levels or orbitals in an atom. It serves as a simplified model to demonstrate quantization of energy and wavelengths but is primarily a Gedankenexperiment, useful for illustrating quantum mechanics. While it provides insights into particle behavior, it is not an accurate representation of atomic structures, such as hydrogen, which lack defined boundaries. The energies and orbitals emerge from solving the Schrödinger equation within this potential. Overall, the box model is a useful educational tool, but it has limitations when applied to real atomic systems.
mishima
Messages
576
Reaction score
43
Hi, I am trying to demonstrate the relation between quantization of energy and wavelengths in a confined box for high school chemistry students. I am following an approach found in Atkins' "Chemical Principles". Anyways, its quite understandable, but I get the feeling maybe the box isn't actually what I think it is. I've been thinking of the box as the energy level (shell). But is it actually the orbital? Or something else entirely? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this a bad question? I understand its just a model, but what is the box analogous to for say, an atom of hydrogen?
 
A one dimensional box is a potential V(x) which is infinite for e.g. x<0, zero for x>=0 and x<=L and again infinite for x>L.
It is not an energy level. The energies and orbitals arise when you solve the Schroedinger equation for a particle moving in that potential.
 
The box is really just a box: a volume with walls which are impenetrable for the particle. Although this is a valid approximation for some real physical systems, it is primarily a Gedankenexperiment which is easy to calculate and illustrates the behaviour of quantum mechanical systems. Especially, it is a quite bad model for atoms because they have no sharp boundary like the box.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
991
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
10K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K