I've noticed that the example of a particle in a box is heavily used even for physical situations where there is no obvious box: for example when finding the degeneracy pressure in a neutron star one calculates the fermi-energy from a 3D-particle in a box.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

So I wondered: is there any good reason why the particle in a box-model holds for a large variety of situations?

Does this has to do with the pauli-exclusion principle? I.e. that the position is constrained by ##\delta x \delta_p = \hbar /2## and we can think of these boxes as ##\delta x## wide?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Viability of particle in a box modeling

Loading...

Similar Threads - Viability particle modeling | Date |
---|---|

I For a particle on a sphere, is zero energy possible? | Saturday at 12:56 PM |

I One particle and two slits | Saturday at 12:00 AM |

I Virtual particles in Feynman diagrams | Friday at 8:55 AM |

I Why is there an arrow mediating a process in a Feynman diagram? | Mar 15, 2018 |

A Non-standard models in QM | Feb 12, 2018 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**