What is the closed form for the sum of binomial coefficients over any interval?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a closed form for the sum of binomial coefficients over a variable interval, specifically ∑K(N,n), where K(N,n) represents the binomial coefficient. Participants explore the implications of varying the limits of summation and the potential for closed forms beyond the standard binomial theorem application.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether a closed form exists for the sum of binomial coefficients over a variable range, suggesting that such a form may not be possible.
  • Another participant proposes that any specific finite sum could be considered a closed form, but emphasizes the complexity of the problem when the range is not fixed.
  • A suggestion is made to use a spreadsheet for calculating sums of binomial coefficients over specific intervals, indicating a practical approach rather than a theoretical closed form.
  • One participant provides an upper limit for the sum of binomial coefficients, referencing the binomial theorem and noting that the sum from n=0 to N equals 2^N.
  • Additional trivia is shared regarding the symmetry of binomial coefficients and specific cases for odd and even N, although this does not resolve the original question about variable intervals.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence of a closed form for the sum of binomial coefficients over variable intervals. While some suggest practical methods for calculation, there is no consensus on a theoretical closed form.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in defining closed forms when the summation limits are not fixed, and the complexity introduced by varying intervals. There are unresolved assumptions regarding the applicability of known results to the proposed problem.

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
Is there a way to find the following sum in closed form:
∑K(N,n) , where K(N,n) is the binomial coefficient and the sum can extend over any interval from n=0..N. I.e. not necessarily n=0 to N in which case on can just use the binomial theorem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi aaaa:

Technically speaking any specific finite sum is a closed form. So, I am assuming what you want is a close form for the sum when the range on the index variable is not fixed, but also a variable. If I am correct about this, I think you are out of luck. I don't think such a closed form exists.

However, the following Wikipedia article on the beta function may be of some help, although it is somewhat complicated. In particular, you may want to look at the discussion on
the "Cumulative distribution function". My vague memory is that the beta function is related to an approximation for the binomial distribution for large N.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_distribution

Regards,
Buzz
 
Hi @aaaa202:

I had another thought about your problem. If what you want is a convenient way to calculate a sum of the terms in a binomial sequence,
S(N,i,j) = Σk=i to j K(N,k) ,​
then it is not too difficult to set up a spreadsheet to do this. Is this what you want?

Regards,
Buzz
 
aaaa202 said:
Is there a way to find the following sum in closed form:
∑K(N,n) , where K(N,n) is the binomial coefficient and the sum can extend over any interval from n=0..N. I.e. not necessarily n=0 to N in which case on can just use the binomial theorem.
Well, we can find an upper limit: [itex] 2^{N}=(1+1)^{N}=\sum_{n=0}^{N}\begin{pmatrix}<br /> N\\<br /> n\\<br /> \end{pmatrix}1^{n}\cdot 1^{N-n}=\sum_{n=0}^{N}\begin{pmatrix}<br /> N\\<br /> n\\<br /> \end{pmatrix}[/itex]
 
Svein said:
Well, we can find an upper limit: [itex] 2^{N}=(1+1)^{N}=\sum_{n=0}^{N}\begin{pmatrix}<br /> N\\<br /> n\\<br /> \end{pmatrix}1^{n}\cdot 1^{N-n}=\sum_{n=0}^{N}\begin{pmatrix}<br /> N\\<br /> n\\<br /> \end{pmatrix}[/itex]
Some additional trivia: [itex] \begin{pmatrix}<br /> N\\<br /> n\\<br /> \end{pmatrix}[/itex] is symmetric ([itex] \begin{pmatrix}<br /> N\\<br /> n\\<br /> \end{pmatrix}=<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> N\\<br /> N-n\\<br /> \end{pmatrix}[/itex]). Therefore for odd N [itex] \sum_{n=0}^{\frac{N+1}{2}}\begin{pmatrix}<br /> N\\<br /> n\\<br /> \end{pmatrix}=2^{N-1}[/itex]. For even N, there is a middle element.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K