What is the configuration of 3 blocks connected by a line and its balance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mojki1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blocks Line
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving three blocks connected by a line, focusing on their balance and the conditions under which they remain stationary. The problem includes parameters such as friction and an angle of 30 degrees.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the conditions for balance, questioning whether the blocks are stationary or moving with zero acceleration. They discuss the need to determine limits for the masses of the blocks rather than the coefficient of friction, which is given.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering insights on the equations involved and the relationships between the variables. There is a recognition that the problem may require a different perspective, particularly regarding the fixed nature of the coefficient of friction and the variable masses.

Contextual Notes

There is some confusion regarding the terminology used, particularly the term "compartments," which is noted as unclear. Additionally, participants highlight that the problem may lack sufficient information, suggesting that something might be missing from the original question.

mojki1
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Last time I have had problem with one task:
http://img543.imageshack.us/i/cosc.jpg/
They questioned us to determine compartments in with that configuration will be on balance.
Informations:
u-Friction
alpha=30

Homework Equations



If that configuration must be on balance so acceleration must be 0. So we can compare forces working on that blocks.
-Qx1-T1-T2=Q3

The Attempt at a Solution



If we compare forces which working on that configuration we will go to moment that masses of that blocks will be reduced.
-mgsin(30)- umgcos(30)-umg=2mg
But this is not a solution of that task.
Sorry for my language. Thx for help:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi mojki1! :smile:

(have an alpha: α and a mu: µ and a degree: ° :wink:)

what exactly is the question?

are the blocks stationary, or are they moving with zero acceleration?

i'm guessing that you mean that the blocks are stationary, and that the question wants you to give the limits (not "compartments" … that doesn't mean anything in physics :wink:) (on µ) within which that is possible

if so, your answer should have "µ" on one side on its own (and perhaps should have a ≤ or ≥ rather than an =) :wink:
mojki1 said:
If that configuration must be on balance so acceleration must be 0. So we can compare forces working on that blocks.
-Qx1-T1-T2=Q3

If we compare forces which working on that configuration we will go to moment that masses of that blocks will be reduced.
-mgsin(30)- umgcos(30)-umg=2mg
But this is not a solution of that task.

your final equation looks correct to me (except that the minuses should be pluses, and you need to cancel the mgs and make it an equation for µ)

btw, "If we compare forces which working on that configuration we will go to moment that masses of that blocks will be reduced" …

i think you mean something like "If we equate the forces on that configuration (or system) at the instant that the blocks are about to move" :smile:
 
You 're right tiny-tim. The blocks are stationary and question is about the limit of the masses of that blocks for which the system remains in balance. µ is given.
Final equation should looks:

mgsin(30°)+ µmgcos(30°)+µmg=2mg

But this isn't standard task that we have to designate limits for µ, we need designate limits for masses not for µ. µ is given. If i compare that equation, masses will be reduced, so i think that we have to look for this problem from another perspective
 
hi mojki1! :smile:
mojki1 said:
mgsin(30°)+ µmgcos(30°)+µmg=2mg

But this isn't standard task that we have to designate limits for µ, we need designate limits for masses not for µ. µ is given. If i compare that equation, masses will be reduced, so i think that we have to look for this problem from another perspective

if µ is fixed (what is it, btw?), and if the ratio of the masses (m:m:2m) is also fixed, then the value of m makes no difference :confused:

there must be something missing from the question :redface:
 
µ is constant for all blocks, only masses are your variables

EDIT:
data for this task were symbols
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
6K