What is the construction of gamma matrices and spinors in higher dimensions?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ismaili
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimensions Spinors
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the construction of gamma matrices and spinors in higher dimensions, specifically within the framework of Clifford algebra as outlined in Polchinski's "String Theory" (Volume II). Participants highlight the use of the Clifford algebra in SO(d-1,1) and the grouping of gamma matrices into sets of anticommuting operators for even dimensions. A key point raised is the necessity of using the Pauli matrix σ3 in the construction of gamma matrices for d = 6 to maintain the correct anti-commutation relations. The conversation also touches on the challenges of understanding these concepts and suggests resources like Van Proeyen's "A Menu of Supergravities" for further reading.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Clifford algebra and its properties
  • Familiarity with gamma matrices and their role in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of Pauli matrices and their applications
  • Basic concepts of spinors in higher-dimensional spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the construction of gamma matrices in various dimensions using "A Menu of Supergravities" by Van Proeyen
  • Explore the properties of Clifford algebra in SO(d-1,1) and its implications for quantum field theory
  • Learn about the role of charge conjugation matrices in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the recursive construction of gamma matrices for higher dimensions
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, mathematicians, and students studying quantum field theory, particularly those interested in the mathematical foundations of string theory and the properties of spinors in higher dimensions.

ismaili
Messages
150
Reaction score
0
Dear guys,

I want to understand the spinors in various dimensions and Clifford algebra. I tried to read the appendix B of Polchinski's volume II of his string theory book. But it's hard for me to follow and I stuck in the very beginning. I will try to figure out the outline and post my questions later.

For now, I want to ask for very simple, introductory articles for the construction of gamma matrices and spinors in various dimensions. (Is the appendix B of Polchinski the simplest article among all?:blushing:)

Thanks for your help!

Ismaili
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe "A menu of supergravities" of Van Proeyen can help you. I found it quite understandable.
 
haushofer said:
Maybe "A menu of supergravities" of Van Proeyen can help you. I found it quite understandable.
Excuse me,
I searched for this book in libraries nearby and on google but I couldn't find it?
Was this book published in english?

---
In the following, I briefly present the content and one of my question by which I stuck.

In the appendix B of Polchinski's string book.
One starts from the Clifford algebra in SO(d-1,1)
\{ \gamma^{\mu} , \gamma^\nu \} = 2\eta^{\mu\nu}<br />
In the even dimension, d = 2k+2, one can group the \gamma^\mu into k+1 sets of anticommuting creation and annihilation operators,
<br /> \gamma^{0\pm} = \frac{1}{2} (\pm\gamma^0 + \gamma^1)<br /> \quad\quad \gamma^{a\pm} = \frac{1}{2}(\gamma^{2a} \pm i \gamma^{2a+1})<br />
where a=1,2,\cdots, k.
One then found that,
<br /> \{ \gamma^{a+}, \gamma^{b-} \} = \delta^{ab}\quad\quad<br /> \{ \gamma^{a+} , \gamma^{b+} \} = \{ \gamma^{a-} , \gamma^{b-} \} = 0<br />
That is, one finds that the gamma matrices can be grouped into the creation and annihilation operators of k species of fermions. In particular, from
(\gamma^{a-})^2 = 0
one sees there exist a vacuum |\xi\rangle annihilated by all \gamma^{a-}.
Thus, by this observation, one constructed the representation of Clifford algebra in the following space,
<br /> (\gamma^{k+})^{s_k+1/2}\cdots(\gamma^{0+})^{s_0+1/2} |xi\rangle<br />
, i.e. a space of the tensor product of k species fermions; so, the dimension of this representation is 2^{k+1}.

In d = 2, one can easily work out the matrix form of the gamma matrices,
\gamma^0 = \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 &amp;1\\ -1 &amp;0\end{array}\right) = i\sigma^2
\gamma^1 = \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 &amp;1\\ 1 &amp;0\end{array}\right) = \sigma^1

One can construct the representation in higher dimensional even space recursively, by d \rightarrow d+2. But now comes my question, for d = 6
<br /> \gamma^0 = i\sigma^2\otimes\textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)}\otimes\textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)}<br />
<br /> \gamma^1 = \sigma^1 \otimes \textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)} \otimes \textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)}<br />
<br /> \quad\quad\quad\vdots<br />
<br /> \gamma^4 = I \otimes I \otimes \sigma^1<br />
<br /> \gamma^5 = I \otimes I \otimes \sigma^2<br />
where I is the 2 by 2 unit matrix.
My question is that, why do we use \textcolor{red}{\sigma^3}? I thought it should be the 2 by 2 identity matrix!

Anybody guides me through this?
Thank you so much for your help!
 
ismaili said:
Excuse me,
I searched for this book in libraries nearby and on google but I couldn't find it?
Was this book published in english?

---
In the following, I briefly present the content and one of my question by which I stuck.

In the appendix B of Polchinski's string book.
One starts from the Clifford algebra in SO(d-1,1)
\{ \gamma^{\mu} , \gamma^\nu \} = 2\eta^{\mu\nu}<br />
In the even dimension, d = 2k+2, one can group the \gamma^\mu into k+1 sets of anticommuting creation and annihilation operators,
<br /> \gamma^{0\pm} = \frac{1}{2} (\pm\gamma^0 + \gamma^1)<br /> \quad\quad \gamma^{a\pm} = \frac{1}{2}(\gamma^{2a} \pm i \gamma^{2a+1})<br />
where a=1,2,\cdots, k.
One then found that,
<br /> \{ \gamma^{a+}, \gamma^{b-} \} = \delta^{ab}\quad\quad<br /> \{ \gamma^{a+} , \gamma^{b+} \} = \{ \gamma^{a-} , \gamma^{b-} \} = 0<br />
That is, one finds that the gamma matrices can be grouped into the creation and annihilation operators of k species of fermions. In particular, from
(\gamma^{a-})^2 = 0
one sees there exist a vacuum |\xi\rangle annihilated by all \gamma^{a-}.
Thus, by this observation, one constructed the representation of Clifford algebra in the following space,
<br /> (\gamma^{k+})^{s_k+1/2}\cdots(\gamma^{0+})^{s_0+1/2} |xi\rangle<br />
, i.e. a space of the tensor product of k species fermions; so, the dimension of this representation is 2^{k+1}.

In d = 2, one can easily work out the matrix form of the gamma matrices,
\gamma^0 = \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 &amp;1\\ -1 &amp;0\end{array}\right) = i\sigma^2
\gamma^1 = \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 &amp;1\\ 1 &amp;0\end{array}\right) = \sigma^1

One can construct the representation in higher dimensional even space recursively, by d \rightarrow d+2. But now comes my question, for d = 6
<br /> \gamma^0 = i\sigma^2\otimes\textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)}\otimes\textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)}<br />
<br /> \gamma^1 = \sigma^1 \otimes \textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)} \otimes \textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)}<br />
<br /> \quad\quad\quad\vdots<br />
<br /> \gamma^4 = I \otimes I \otimes \sigma^1<br />
<br /> \gamma^5 = I \otimes I \otimes \sigma^2<br />
where I is the 2 by 2 unit matrix.
My question is that, why do we use \textcolor{red}{\sigma^3}? I thought it should be the 2 by 2 identity matrix!

Anybody guides me through this?
Thank you so much for your help!

I think I know the answer to the use of \sigma^3.
The gamma matrices in d = 2 invole only \sigma^1, \sigma^2.
When we add the spacetime dimension by 2,
in order to get the correct anti-commutation relations,
we have to tensor product the original gamma matrices by \sigma^3.

-----

After figuring out the construction of higher dimensional gamma matrices,
I was confused by the suddenly born conjugation matrix B and charge conjugation matrix C
...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K