What Is the Correct Angle for an Umbrella in Rain Relative to a Walking Man?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the angle at which a man should hold an umbrella to shield himself from rain that appears to be falling at a velocity 1.5 times his walking speed. The problem involves understanding relative velocities and the geometric interpretation of angles with respect to vertical and horizontal orientations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the velocities of rain and the man, questioning the correct interpretation of the angle with respect to vertical versus horizontal. There is also a discussion about the representation of vectors in different quadrants based on the direction of rain.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered clarifications regarding the angle definitions and the implications of different coordinate systems. There is an ongoing exploration of the correct interpretation of angles related to the direction of rain, with no explicit consensus reached on the initial problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating potential misunderstandings regarding the definitions of angles in relation to vertical and horizontal axes, as well as the implications of vector representation in different quadrants. The original poster's question about the book's answer highlights a possible miscommunication regarding angle reference points.

manjuvenamma
Messages
102
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Rain is falling down vertically. To a man walking on the road, velocity of rain appears to be 1.5 times his velocity. Then to protect himself from rain, he holds his umbrella at an angle (theta) to the vertical such that tan (theta) =


Homework Equations



The relative velocity of rain to man is R-M where R is rain velocity and M is man's velocity.


The Attempt at a Solution



Assume the rain velocity vector is R. We can think it is -rJ. J is a unit vector along y axis. r is the magnitude of rain velocity. The negative sign comes because of the direction of rain - down.

Similarly M = mI where I is unit vector along x axis. The relative velocity of rain to man is R-M = -rJ-mI.

The magnitude of R-M is 1.5m (given).

1.5m = sqrt(r^2+m^2) implies m/r = 2/sqrt(5) = tan(theta).

But the answer stated in the book is the reciprocal i.e. sqrt(5)/2. Who is right?




 
Physics news on Phys.org
The book is correct. Note that they ask for the angle with respect to the vertical. :wink:
 
I considered angle with the vertical only. For angle with the vertical the tan would be

side an x axix/side on y axis

which in our case is m/r which was derived equal to 2/sqrt(5).

Please let me know where I am going wrong if I am.
 
Oops! My bad. You were correct. The book gave the angle w.r.t. the horizontal, not the vertical. (Sorry about that! :redface:)
 
Another related question. Rain is falling in NW direction. Will the vector be in the 2nd quadrant or the 4th quadrant? Why I am asking this is that it is a subtle but importnat difference. The angle will be different in the two cases event thoufh raising out of the same event. Generally we draw all vectors starting from origin. Here if we draw the vector starting from origin (parallel shifts of vectors are equal vectors) it will be in the 4th quadrant. If we draw the vector ending at the origin it will be in the second quadrant.
 
I don't understand your question. How are you defining your coordinates?
 
OK, let me put the question in other words. The rain falling from NW direction will it be making 135 degrees with the EAST (x axis) and fall in the second quadrant or will it be making 315 degrees with the EAST (x axis) and fall in the 4th quardrant)? Direciton of the rain is NW, so if we draw a vector originating from the origin ( as we do for all position vectors) then this will be in the fourth quadrant, the vector makes an angle of 315 degrees. But we generally think NW makes an angle of 135 with the EAST. Hence my question? Thanks.
 
from the NW or to the NW?

manjuvenamma said:
OK, let me put the question in other words. The rain falling from NW direction will it be making 135 degrees with the EAST (x axis) and fall in the second quadrant or will it be making 315 degrees with the EAST (x axis) and fall in the 4th quardrant)? Direciton of the rain is NW, so if we draw a vector originating from the origin ( as we do for all position vectors) then this will be in the fourth quadrant, the vector makes an angle of 315 degrees. But we generally think NW makes an angle of 135 with the EAST. Hence my question? Thanks.
If the direction of the rain is from the NW, it will make an angle of 315 degrees with the East. If you drew the velocity vector of the rain from the origin, it would lie in the 4th quadrant.

On the other hand, if the direction of the rain is to the NW, it will make an angle of 135 degrees with the East and lie in the 2nd quadrant.

Take your pick!
 
Thanks, that is what I too thought and that appears logical. Even though NW, in the normal usage means 135 degrees with the east when we say from NW, the vector should be 315 degrees with the East.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
792
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K