What is the correct expression for the entropy of a gas with a potential wall?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the entropy of a gas in the presence of a movable potential wall. Participants are exploring the implications of the wall's position on the entropy expression and the relationship between temperature and energy in an isolated system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the role of the wall's position in the entropy calculation and question the adequacy of the provided entropy expression. There are attempts to relate temperature and energy to the wall's position, with some expressing uncertainty about how to incorporate the wall's energy into the entropy expression.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their thoughts on the relationship between the wall's position, energy, and entropy. Some have offered insights into the partition function and its implications, while others are seeking clarification on specific aspects of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem specifies only the mean energy and that the system is isolated, leading to questions about how to derive temperature and entropy from the given information. There is also mention of the need to consider the wall's position in the volume calculation for the gas.

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


See the attached picture


Homework Equations


The equations given should be the relevant ones.


The Attempt at a Solution


I feel I got a bad intuition and understanding of this problem. I could eliminate T in favor of S and then express x and T by U and S. Is this how its supposed to be done? I don't think so, because I wonna use the information that the wall slides without friction at some point. Anyone have an idea what to do?
Also I don't agree with the expression for the entropy given. If you do a phase space integral to find the partition function you have to integrate over the walls position too, so you end up with an expression where T is not just raised to the power of 3N/2 but more (after all the 3N/2 is just an ideal gas in a container with fixed walls). Don't YOU agree on this?
 

Attachments

  • Gas.png
    Gas.png
    30.6 KB · Views: 499
Physics news on Phys.org
The information about the wall's position is contained in the volume in the equation for the entropy. That is, the volume of the gas will be the surface area of the wall times a linear length which contains the variable x. Your attachment doesn't specify what x is measured relative to, so I can't say for certain what that length scale is.

So, your equation for entropy seems like it should be fine, or at least approximately fine. Now you just need to use it to determine the equilibrium condition.

To do that, note that your problem states that system is isolated and the energy, U, is known. So, it sounds like the energy isn't changing, is that correct? If so, your equation for U then relates the temperature to the wall's position.
 
The problem is exactly that the problem only specifies that the mean energy is known. But I suppose that doesn't make a difference. The mean of the energy will in any case be the same at all times if the system is isolated, so indeed my equation for U relates the position of the wall to the temperature. Problem is then just that I have to specify the temperature too. Do I get that from the equation for the entropy? I still don't see how the expression for the entropy accommodates for the energy from the wall. If you calculate the partition function you would get an integral of exp(-x^2/T) which would make the partition function and thus the entropy different from the one of an ideal gas. I don't know - maybe it's gibberish.
Also x is measured from the bottom of the container.
 
The problem is exactly that the problem only specifies that the mean energy is known. But I suppose that doesn't make a difference. The mean of the energy will in any case be the same at all times if the system is isolated, so indeed my equation for U relates the position of the wall to the temperature. Problem is then just that I have to specify the temperature too. Do I get that from the equation for the entropy? I still don't see how the expression for the entropy accommodates for the energy from the wall. If you calculate the partition function you would get an integral of exp(-x^2/T) which would make the partition function and thus the entropy different from the one of an ideal gas. I don't know - maybe it's gibberish.
Also x is measured from the bottom of the container.
 
aaaa202 said:
The problem is exactly that the problem only specifies that the mean energy is known. But I suppose that doesn't make a difference. The mean of the energy will in any case be the same at all times if the system is isolated, so indeed my equation for U relates the position of the wall to the temperature. Problem is then just that I have to specify the temperature too. Do I get that from the equation for the entropy? I still don't see how the expression for the entropy accommodates for the energy from the wall. If you calculate the partition function you would get an integral of exp(-x^2/T) which would make the partition function and thus the entropy different from the one of an ideal gas. I don't know - maybe it's gibberish.
Also x is measured from the bottom of the container.

If ##x## is the distance from the leftmost edge of the box to the movable wall, then the volume of the gas should just be ##V = Ax##, where A is the surface area of the movable wall. Then, the formula you are given would be ##S \sim N \ln(x T^{3/2})##. If that's the equation the problem gives you, you can just work with it by assumption to derive the final answer.

I don't have time to try and work out the partition function myself, so I can't really answer whether or not the factor ##\exp(-x^2/T)## that you calculate is correct or if gets canceled out by something, etc.

If U is not fixed, then I would guess that you need to use both the second law and the fact that the system will likely try to minimize its energy. By minimizing the energy, you could find a relation between x and T that you could insert into ##S##, which you could then maximize to find the final temperature and position.

You should post your calculation of the partition function. Perhaps someone else here will have time to go through it with you and see if they agree that the entropy expression given by the problem does not sufficiently describe the system.
 
Here is my calculation of the partition function. The crucial point is that I sum over all positions of the wall (we might as well extend the integral to infinity) and multiply it by all states of each atom. I should think that is combinatorically correct, but its probably wrong.
 

Attachments

  • partition func.png
    partition func.png
    11.7 KB · Views: 474

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K