Chemistry What is the Correct Formula of the Metal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lioric
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Metal
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a confusing chemistry question regarding the formula of a metal oxide. The original poster suggests that the question should specify "0.1 mol of metal X (Ar = 27)" burned in oxygen, leading to a calculated oxide mass of 5.1g. They derive the mass of oxygen and determine a ratio of metal to oxygen, concluding that the formula is X2O3, identifying X as aluminum. Participants note that the question contains contradictory elements, complicating the interpretation, but agree that the OP's calculations are valid based on their assumptions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clarity in scientific questions to avoid confusion.
lioric
Messages
335
Reaction score
26
Homework Statement
0.1 mol of metal X (Ar = 27) was burned in oxygen to give an oxide with mass of 5.1g. What is the formula of the metal oxide if it has a relative molecular mass of 30?

The choices are
XO
X2O3
XO2
X2O

The answer says X2O

But if I add up X2O the RMM is 70 not 30
Relevant Equations
This question is confusing
I don't understand how the RMM could be 30
I haven't gone into a solution cause I found this question confusing
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Something is definitely wrong with the question and the answer given.

My bet is it should read: "0.1 mol of metal X (Ar = 27) was burned in oxygen to give an oxide with mass of 5.1g. What is the formula of the metal oxide?"
 
I found the mass of the X by 27x0.1=2.7g
I subtracted 5.1g-2.7g=2.4g of oxygen
So changed the mass of oxygen to moles which = 0.15
Ratio it with 0.1 mol of X and I get 1:1.5
So X:O is 2:3 ratio
There for X2O3
Which makes sense cause At=27 is Aluminium
And Aluminium Oxide is Al2O3
 
Your logic is good but it doesn’t apply to what is asked. The truly confusing part is the “(Ar=27)” and the 5.1 g. :)

If we ignore that part, the rest of the question tracks normally.

If RMM=30:

XO case: atomic mass X = 14 (N, nonmetal)
X2O3 case: atomic mass X= -9 (not real)
XO2 case: atomic mass X=-2 (not real)
X20 case: atomic mass X=7 (Li)
This should be the end of the problem.

balanced equation

2Li (.1 mol) + 1/2O2 ——-> Li2O (.05 mol)

It does make 1.5 g of product. A dyslexic 5.1 g?
 
Last edited:
chemisttree said:
Your logic is good but it doesn’t apply to what is asked.

Let's not confuse the OP further. Question asks what is the formula and that's exactly what OP calculated, so their logic applies. Answer depends on which parts of the contradicting information given in the question one considers erroneous and decides to ignore.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top