What Is the Correct Water Level for the Third Resonance in a Closed-Open Tube?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the correct water level for the third resonance in a closed-open tube when using a tuning fork with a frequency of 512 Hz. The speed of sound is given as 343 m/s, and the resonance levels are calculated using the formula for a closed-open tube. Initial calculations suggest that the third resonance corresponds to a water level of 50.2 cm, but this is disputed as it misinterprets the value of n. The correct approach involves recognizing that n does not directly correlate to the resonance number, and understanding the positions of nodes and antinodes is crucial for accurately identifying resonance levels. Ultimately, the correct water level for the third resonance is identified as 83.7 cm.
Any Help
Messages
79
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



A vibrating tuning fork of frequency 512 Hz is held over a water column with one end closed and the other open. As the water level is allowed to fall, a loud sound (resonance) is heard at specific water levels. Assume you start with the tube full of water, and begin steadily lowering the water level. What is the water level (as measured from the top of the tube) for the third such resonance? Take the speed of sound in air to be 343 m/s.


  • A

    83.7 cm


  • B

    16.7 cm

  • C

    33.5 cm
  • wrong-icon.png


    D

    50.2 cm


  • E

    167 cm

Homework Equations



in a fundamental frequency (f):
λ=2L/n and f=n/2L .v for waves whose both ends are open
λ=4L/n and f=n/4L .v for waves whose one end closed and the second is open
n is a positive integer; n= 0,1,2,3,4,5,6...
v is the velocity
L is the length of string
λ is the wavelength

The Attempt at a Solution


here we have one open and other closed ends then we use λ=4L/n and f=n/4L .v
so f=512Hz, n=3 (third such resonance) and v=343m/sec
substitute in the equation
we get L equal 0.502m=50.2cm then it is D
but why the correct answer is A??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
n = 3 is incorrect. The best thing to do for these types of problems is to draw a diagram of the standing wave for the situation. You can then determine L from the diagram.
 
Last edited:
TSny said:
n = 3 is incorrect. The best thing to for these types of problems is to draw a diagram of the standing wave for the situation. You can then determine L from the diagram.
I didn't get your point. How can I draw diagram for it? Besides why n=3 is not correct? what do they mean by the third such resonance?
 
Any Help said:
How can I draw diagram for it?
When the level of the water is at a position of resonance, what can you say about the positions of nodes and antinodes, especially at the top of the tube and at the top of the water? You can use this knowledge as a guide for drawing the various cases where you get resonance.
Besides why n=3 is not correct?
The n in the formula does not necessarily correspond to the number of the resonance. Thus n = 3 does not correspond to the third resonance in your situation.
What do they mean by the third such resonance?
Imagine the water level starts at the top of the tube. As the level of the water is lowered in the tube while the fork is vibrating, there will be certain positions of the level of the water that will cause the sound from the fork to resonate. The first level that produces a resonance is the first resonance. The next level of water that produces resonance is the second resonance. And so on.
 
Last edited:
Beams of electrons and protons move parallel to each other in the same direction. They ______. a. attract each other. b. repel each other. c. neither attract nor repel. d. the force of attraction or repulsion depends upon the speed of the beams. This is a previous-year-question of CBSE Board 2023. The answer key marks (b) as the right option. I want to know why we are ignoring Coulomb's force?
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
I treat this question as two cases of Doppler effect. (1) When the sound wave travels from bat to moth Speed of sound = 222 x 1.5 = 333 m/s Frequency received by moth: $$f_1=\frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ (2) When the sound wave is reflected from moth back to bat Frequency received by bat (moth as source and bat as observer): $$f_2=\frac{333}{333-v}\times f_1$$ $$230.3=\frac{333}{333-v}\times \frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ Solving this equation, I get ##v=6.1## m/s but the answer key is...

Similar threads