What Is the Correct Water Level for the Third Resonance in a Closed-Open Tube?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the correct water level for the third resonance in a closed-open tube when using a tuning fork with a frequency of 512 Hz. The speed of sound is given as 343 m/s, and the resonance levels are calculated using the formula for a closed-open tube. Initial calculations suggest that the third resonance corresponds to a water level of 50.2 cm, but this is disputed as it misinterprets the value of n. The correct approach involves recognizing that n does not directly correlate to the resonance number, and understanding the positions of nodes and antinodes is crucial for accurately identifying resonance levels. Ultimately, the correct water level for the third resonance is identified as 83.7 cm.
Any Help
Messages
79
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



A vibrating tuning fork of frequency 512 Hz is held over a water column with one end closed and the other open. As the water level is allowed to fall, a loud sound (resonance) is heard at specific water levels. Assume you start with the tube full of water, and begin steadily lowering the water level. What is the water level (as measured from the top of the tube) for the third such resonance? Take the speed of sound in air to be 343 m/s.


  • A

    83.7 cm


  • B

    16.7 cm

  • C

    33.5 cm
  • wrong-icon.png


    D

    50.2 cm


  • E

    167 cm

Homework Equations



in a fundamental frequency (f):
λ=2L/n and f=n/2L .v for waves whose both ends are open
λ=4L/n and f=n/4L .v for waves whose one end closed and the second is open
n is a positive integer; n= 0,1,2,3,4,5,6...
v is the velocity
L is the length of string
λ is the wavelength

The Attempt at a Solution


here we have one open and other closed ends then we use λ=4L/n and f=n/4L .v
so f=512Hz, n=3 (third such resonance) and v=343m/sec
substitute in the equation
we get L equal 0.502m=50.2cm then it is D
but why the correct answer is A??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
n = 3 is incorrect. The best thing to do for these types of problems is to draw a diagram of the standing wave for the situation. You can then determine L from the diagram.
 
Last edited:
TSny said:
n = 3 is incorrect. The best thing to for these types of problems is to draw a diagram of the standing wave for the situation. You can then determine L from the diagram.
I didn't get your point. How can I draw diagram for it? Besides why n=3 is not correct? what do they mean by the third such resonance?
 
Any Help said:
How can I draw diagram for it?
When the level of the water is at a position of resonance, what can you say about the positions of nodes and antinodes, especially at the top of the tube and at the top of the water? You can use this knowledge as a guide for drawing the various cases where you get resonance.
Besides why n=3 is not correct?
The n in the formula does not necessarily correspond to the number of the resonance. Thus n = 3 does not correspond to the third resonance in your situation.
What do they mean by the third such resonance?
Imagine the water level starts at the top of the tube. As the level of the water is lowered in the tube while the fork is vibrating, there will be certain positions of the level of the water that will cause the sound from the fork to resonate. The first level that produces a resonance is the first resonance. The next level of water that produces resonance is the second resonance. And so on.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top