Standing wave in a tube -- multiple choice question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a standing wave problem in a tube, specifically focusing on the effects of cutting the tube in half and closing one end. Participants are examining the relationship between the length of the tube, wavelength, and frequency of the sound produced.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are analyzing the implications of cutting the tube in half on the frequency and wavelength. There is a focus on confirming the correctness of assumptions regarding the speed of sound and its constancy in air. Questions are raised about the clarity of notation used in the calculations and the reasoning behind the frequency changes when altering the tube's length and closure.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's reasoning and notation. Some guidance has been offered regarding the implications of cutting the tube and closing one end, prompting further exploration of the relationships between length, wavelength, and frequency.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the notation used for the lengths and frequencies, which may hinder understanding. Participants are encouraged to clarify their expressions and consider the effects of the tube modifications on the sound properties.

EF17xx
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Screen Shot 2018-03-27 at 16.19.22.png

The correct answer according to answer sheet is answer B.

Homework Equations


λn= 2L/n (both ends open)
λn = 4L/n (one end open one end closed)
c=λf

Speed of sound does not change. as it is still in air... (correct assumption? )

The Attempt at a Solution


f1= 500Hz
L = λ/2
f= v/2L

Tube cut in half means L/2 = λ/4
L(new)= λ/4
f= v/4L(new)

Lnew = L/2

Therefore

v/4(L/2) = f
f= v/2L
therefore f is still 500Hz

I am just wondering if my reasoning and assumptions are CORRECT could someone please confirm.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-03-27 at 16.19.22.png
    Screen Shot 2018-03-27 at 16.19.22.png
    9.4 KB · Views: 1,039
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes - half-wavelength in the open tube, quarter-wavelength in the closed tube half as long - same wavelength and frequency.
 
EF17xx said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 222833
The correct answer according to answer sheet is answer B.

Homework Equations


λn= 2L/n (both ends open)
λn = 4L/n (one end open one end closed)
c=λf

Speed of sound does not change. as it is still in air... (correct assumption? )

The Attempt at a Solution


f1= 500Hz
L = λ/2
f= v/2L

Tube cut in half means L/2 = λ/4
L(new)= λ/4
f= v/4L(new)

Lnew = L/2

Therefore

v/4(L/2) = f
f= v/2L
therefore f is still 500Hz

I am just wondering if my reasoning and assumptions are CORRECT could someone please confirm.

It appears that you have cut the tube in half twice and somehow ended up with the same frequency at the end. I think you might start by asking yourself, "What does cutting the tube in half do to the frequency?" and "What does closing the end do to the frequency?"

Part of what makes your reasoning difficult to follow is notation like v/4(L/2) = f. Does that mean ##\frac {vL}8## or ##\frac v{2L}##? Also, you have used variables Lnew and L(new). Do they mean the same thing or something different? Using clearer notation can help you and other people understand what you wrote. Take a look at the LaTeX guide.
 
Lnew is the length of the tube after it has been cut in half expressed in terms of the original length of the tube (L) therefore L(new) = L/2

(v) / (4(L/2))

Therefore f= v/2L
 
EF17xx said:
Lnew is the length of the tube after it has been cut in half expressed in terms of the original length of the tube (L) therefore L(new) = L/2

(v) / (4(L/2))

Therefore f= v/2L
OK, it looks like you mean that L(new) = Lnew = L/2. So your reasoning seems to go like this:

When the length of the tube is ##L##, the wavelength of the first harmonic is ##L = \frac λ 2##. The original frequency of the first harmonic is then
##f_0 = \frac v λ = \frac v {2L}##

Cutting the tube in half reduces the frequency by the same factor, so
##L_{new} = \frac L 2 = \frac λ 4##

Then ##f_0 = \frac v λ = \frac v {4 L_{new}}##

So now you have expressed the original frequency in terms of ##L_{new}##. You have not said anything about what happens to the frequency when you reduce the length of the tube.

Now you substitute ##\frac L 2## for ##L_{new}## and get back your original equation
##f_0 = \frac v λ##

You still have not said anything about what happens to the frequency when you reduce the size of the tube, and you have not considered what happens when you close the end of the tube.

I suggest that you try this:
1) Consider what happens to the wavelength when you shorten the tube. Write an equation for the new wavelength ##λ'## in terms of ##λ##.
2) Consider what happens to the wavelength when you close the end of the tube. Write an equation for this newer wavelength ##λ''## in terms of ##λ'##.
3) Compare ##λ''## with ##λ##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K