What Is the Current Job Market for Imaging Physicists?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the current job market for imaging physicists, particularly those with a background in medical physics. Participants share their experiences and insights regarding career opportunities, challenges in securing positions, and the overall landscape of diagnostic imaging within the medical physics field.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant with a PhD in medical physics expresses difficulty in finding interviews for diagnostic imaging positions, noting a predominance of therapy/radiation physics jobs.
  • Another participant suggests exploring companies that manufacture imaging devices, such as GE and Siemens, as potential employers.
  • A therapy physicist points out that diagnostic imaging physicists represent a smaller segment of the medical physics workforce, which may contribute to the scarcity of available positions.
  • This participant speculates that while there are many imaging devices, the lack of legislative requirements for diagnostic imaging physicists in clinical settings may limit job opportunities.
  • A retired medical physicist highlights the low number of full-time diagnostic imaging positions listed by the AAPM and discusses the financial challenges of justifying salaries for these roles in community hospitals.
  • This retired physicist also notes the increasing difficulty for therapy physicists to cover diagnostic imaging responsibilities due to the demands of their primary roles.
  • Suggestions are made for new medical physicists to consider roles that combine therapy and diagnostic imaging, or to explore contracting opportunities among local hospitals to share resources.
  • Networking at AAPM meetings and engaging with equipment vendors are recommended as strategies for finding job opportunities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a general consensus on the challenges faced by imaging physicists in the job market, particularly regarding the limited number of positions available. However, there are differing views on the reasons for this scarcity and the potential for future growth in the field.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various factors influencing the job market, including the legislative environment, financial justifications for hiring diagnostic imaging physicists, and the evolving responsibilities of therapy physicists. These factors remain unresolved and are subject to individual interpretation.

azizhp
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have a PhD in medical physics from the MD Anderson CAMPEP program and I even took ABR step 1 (just prior to the cut off for residency requirements). Are there any imaging physicists here? would really like to get your feedback on the current outlook for diagphys careers. I have not been having much luck even getting an interview. Almost every job is a therapy/radphys job.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps you could check out the companies that make imaging devices like Catscans and MRI units.

GE and Siemens come to mind.
 
I'm a therapy physicist. If you lump diagnostic imaging together with MRI and nuclear medicine physicists, you get roughly 20% of the population of medical physicists, so DI is certainly a much smaller branch, which is why it's a lot harder to find the positions in the first place.

I've always thought that DI physicists, in principle, could have a much larger number of positions than they actually do, simply because of the vast number of imaging devices used. However (perhaps some state-specific cases aside) there's no major legislation that I'm aware of that says you need to have a DI physicist commission or QA or in any way be involved with your imaging equipment on a clinical level. And often the technologists operating the units are quite capable of performing the necessary QA testing, and the vendors then address any issues when the equipment begins operating outside of recommended tolerances. I think the major need for DI physicists comes in when you're pushing the boundaries of the technology (I could be wrong on this though). Unless this changes, I suspect that DI physics positions are going to track roughly with therapy positions (growing as a result of increased number of people getting cancer), but the ratio will likely remain the same.
 
The AAPM (are you a member?) lists only 7 full time DI positions out of almost 40 positions. I am a retired MP mostly RT but had significant experience in DI and RS. A recent (last fall) bulletin board posting on the AAPM site discussed DI Phys. opportunities and needs. mostly from the aspect when can you hire a DI Phys. to take the load of a therapy phys who covers DI as many solo practicing physics do or did. A big issue is that it is hard to justify the salary of such person in most community hospitals since this position generate no revenue. But having a therapy physicist covering DI is becoming more difficult if not impossible with the intensive work currently required in RT and ACR certifcation programs for DI. In my case I declined to cover DI for that reason and the hospital hired a private MP company do the special QA for CT, MRI, and Mammo as well as quarterly NM inspections and some RS activities. Routine QA for standard x-ray and daily suggested QA for CT, MRI, etc was left up to the techs. For a new MP as your self if you are willing to do some therapy as well as diagnostic and radiation safety you might be a welcome addition to a MP staff in a community hospital.( although I am not absolutely positive the current acceptability of such an arrangement), Alternately you might consider private MP services such as contracting between several local hospitals to cover DI and RS to split the financial burden. Have you attended the annual AAPM meetings to network with members to get ideas as well as post your availability. You will also be able to talk to DI equipment vendors about opportunities.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K