MHB What is the definition of 2^M and how can it be determined?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

  1. Let $M:=\{7,4,0,3\}$. Determine $2^M$.
  2. Prove or disprove $2^{A\times B}=\{A'\times B'\mid A'\subseteq A, B'\subseteq B\}$.
  3. Let $a\neq b\in \mathbb{R}$ and $M:=2^{\{a,b\}}$. Determine $2^M$.
  4. Is there a set $M$, such that $2^M=\emptyset$ ?

First of all how is $2^M$ defined? Is this the powerset? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
First of all how is $2^M$ defined? Is this the powerset?

Hey mathmari!

Yep.
So $2^{\{a,b\}}=\{\varnothing,\{a\},\{b\},\{a,b\}\}$. (Thinking)
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
Yep.
So $2^{\{a,b\}}=\{\varnothing,\{a\},\{b\},\{a,b\}\}$. (Thinking)

So we have the following:
  1. $2^M=\{\emptyset, \{7\}, \{4\}, \{0\}, \{3\}, \{7,4\}, \{7,0\}, \{7,3\}, \{4,0\}, \{4,3\}, \{0,3\},\{7,4,0\}, \{7,4,3\}, \{7,0,3\}, \{4,0,3\}, \{7,4,0,3\}$
  2. $2^{A\times B}=\text{ set of every subset of } A\times B=\{(a,b)\mid a\in A, b\in B\}$.

    So it is of the form $2^{A\times B}=\{\emptyset, \{(a_i, b_i)\}, \{(a_i, b_i), (a_j, b_j)\}, \cdots \}$, or not?

    This is not of the form $\{A'\times B'\mid A'\subseteq A, B'\subseteq B\}$, is it? (Wondering)
  3. We have that $M=\{\emptyset, \{a\}, \{b\}, \{a,b\}\}$.

    The $2^M=\{\emptyset, \{\emptyset\}, \{\{a\}\},\{\{b\}\}, \{\{a,b\}\}, \{\emptyset, \{a\}\}, \{\emptyset, \{b\}\}, \{\emptyset, \{a,b\}\}, \{\{a\}, \{b\}\}, \{\{a\}, \{a,b\}\}, \{\{a,b\}, \{b\}\}, \{\emptyset, \{a\}, \{b\}\}, \{\emptyset, \{a\}, \{a,b\}\}, \{\emptyset, \{a,b\}, \{b\}\}, \{\emptyset, \{a\}, \{b\}, \{a,b\}\}$

    Is this correct? Or do I miss something? (Wondering)
  4. There isn't such a set, since at least the emptyset is contained in the powerset. Is this correct? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
So we have the following:

1. $2^M=\{\emptyset, \{7\}, \{4\}, \{0\}, \{3\}, \{7,4\}, \{7,0\}, \{7,3\}, \{4,0\}, \{4,3\}, \{0,3\},\{7,4,0\}, \{7,4,3\}, \{7,0,3\}, \{4,0,3\}, \{7,4,0,3\}$

2. $2^{A\times B}=\text{ set of every subset of } A\times B=\{(a,b)\mid a\in A, b\in B\}$.

So it is of the form $2^{A\times B}=\{\emptyset, \{(a_i, b_i)\}, \{(a_i, b_i), (a_j, b_j)\}, \cdots \}$, or not?

This is not of the form $\{A'\times B'\mid A'\subseteq A, B'\subseteq B\}$, is it? (Wondering)

3. We have that $M=\{\emptyset, \{a\}, \{b\}, \{a,b\}\}$.

The $2^M=\{\emptyset, \{\emptyset\}, \{\{a\}\},\{\{b\}\}, \{\{a,b\}\}, \{\emptyset, \{a\}\}, \{\emptyset, \{b\}\}, \{\emptyset, \{a,b\}\}, \{\{a\}, \{b\}\}, \{\{a\}, \{a,b\}\}, \{\{a,b\}, \{b\}\}, \{\emptyset, \{a\}, \{b\}\}, \{\emptyset, \{a\}, \{a,b\}\}, \{\emptyset, \{a,b\}, \{b\}\}, \{\emptyset, \{a\}, \{b\}, \{a,b\}\}$

Is this correct? Or do I miss something?

4. There isn't such a set, since at least the emptyset is contained in the powerset. Is this correct?

All correct.
Did you miss something? Only the closing brace. (Tauri)
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
All correct.
Did you miss something? Only the closing brace. (Tauri)

Great! At 2 how can we disprove that formally? (Wondering)
 
A question of my own.

Say we have [math]A = \{1, 2, 4 \}[/math] and [math]B = \{ 1, 2, 3 \}[/math]

Why wouldn't [math]2^{A \times B}[/math] have sets with the form [math]\{ a_i, b_j \}[/math] rather than just [math]\{ a_i, b_i \}[/math]?

And, since we are talking about a Cartesian product wouldn't [math]2^{ \{ 1, 2 \} }[/math] be different from [math]2^{ \{ 2, 1 \} }[/math]?

Thanks!

-Dan
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top