What is the definition of 2^M and how can it be determined?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the definition and properties of the power set, denoted as \(2^M\), where \(M\) is a set. Participants confirm that \(2^{\{7,4,0,3\}}\) results in the power set containing all subsets of \(M\). They also explore the relationship \(2^{A \times B}\) and clarify that it does not conform to the form \(\{A' \times B' \mid A' \subseteq A, B' \subseteq B\}\). Additionally, it is established that no set \(M\) exists such that \(2^M = \emptyset\), as the empty set is always included in any power set.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set theory and power sets
  • Familiarity with Cartesian products of sets
  • Knowledge of mathematical notation and definitions
  • Basic concepts of subsets and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of power sets in set theory
  • Learn about Cartesian products and their implications in set operations
  • Explore formal proofs in set theory to understand subset relationships
  • Investigate the implications of empty sets in mathematical contexts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying set theory, educators teaching mathematical concepts, and anyone interested in the formal properties of power sets and Cartesian products.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

  1. Let $M:=\{7,4,0,3\}$. Determine $2^M$.
  2. Prove or disprove $2^{A\times B}=\{A'\times B'\mid A'\subseteq A, B'\subseteq B\}$.
  3. Let $a\neq b\in \mathbb{R}$ and $M:=2^{\{a,b\}}$. Determine $2^M$.
  4. Is there a set $M$, such that $2^M=\emptyset$ ?

First of all how is $2^M$ defined? Is this the powerset? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
First of all how is $2^M$ defined? Is this the powerset?

Hey mathmari!

Yep.
So $2^{\{a,b\}}=\{\varnothing,\{a\},\{b\},\{a,b\}\}$. (Thinking)
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
Yep.
So $2^{\{a,b\}}=\{\varnothing,\{a\},\{b\},\{a,b\}\}$. (Thinking)

So we have the following:
  1. $2^M=\{\emptyset, \{7\}, \{4\}, \{0\}, \{3\}, \{7,4\}, \{7,0\}, \{7,3\}, \{4,0\}, \{4,3\}, \{0,3\},\{7,4,0\}, \{7,4,3\}, \{7,0,3\}, \{4,0,3\}, \{7,4,0,3\}$
  2. $2^{A\times B}=\text{ set of every subset of } A\times B=\{(a,b)\mid a\in A, b\in B\}$.

    So it is of the form $2^{A\times B}=\{\emptyset, \{(a_i, b_i)\}, \{(a_i, b_i), (a_j, b_j)\}, \cdots \}$, or not?

    This is not of the form $\{A'\times B'\mid A'\subseteq A, B'\subseteq B\}$, is it? (Wondering)
  3. We have that $M=\{\emptyset, \{a\}, \{b\}, \{a,b\}\}$.

    The $2^M=\{\emptyset, \{\emptyset\}, \{\{a\}\},\{\{b\}\}, \{\{a,b\}\}, \{\emptyset, \{a\}\}, \{\emptyset, \{b\}\}, \{\emptyset, \{a,b\}\}, \{\{a\}, \{b\}\}, \{\{a\}, \{a,b\}\}, \{\{a,b\}, \{b\}\}, \{\emptyset, \{a\}, \{b\}\}, \{\emptyset, \{a\}, \{a,b\}\}, \{\emptyset, \{a,b\}, \{b\}\}, \{\emptyset, \{a\}, \{b\}, \{a,b\}\}$

    Is this correct? Or do I miss something? (Wondering)
  4. There isn't such a set, since at least the emptyset is contained in the powerset. Is this correct? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
So we have the following:

1. $2^M=\{\emptyset, \{7\}, \{4\}, \{0\}, \{3\}, \{7,4\}, \{7,0\}, \{7,3\}, \{4,0\}, \{4,3\}, \{0,3\},\{7,4,0\}, \{7,4,3\}, \{7,0,3\}, \{4,0,3\}, \{7,4,0,3\}$

2. $2^{A\times B}=\text{ set of every subset of } A\times B=\{(a,b)\mid a\in A, b\in B\}$.

So it is of the form $2^{A\times B}=\{\emptyset, \{(a_i, b_i)\}, \{(a_i, b_i), (a_j, b_j)\}, \cdots \}$, or not?

This is not of the form $\{A'\times B'\mid A'\subseteq A, B'\subseteq B\}$, is it? (Wondering)

3. We have that $M=\{\emptyset, \{a\}, \{b\}, \{a,b\}\}$.

The $2^M=\{\emptyset, \{\emptyset\}, \{\{a\}\},\{\{b\}\}, \{\{a,b\}\}, \{\emptyset, \{a\}\}, \{\emptyset, \{b\}\}, \{\emptyset, \{a,b\}\}, \{\{a\}, \{b\}\}, \{\{a\}, \{a,b\}\}, \{\{a,b\}, \{b\}\}, \{\emptyset, \{a\}, \{b\}\}, \{\emptyset, \{a\}, \{a,b\}\}, \{\emptyset, \{a,b\}, \{b\}\}, \{\emptyset, \{a\}, \{b\}, \{a,b\}\}$

Is this correct? Or do I miss something?

4. There isn't such a set, since at least the emptyset is contained in the powerset. Is this correct?

All correct.
Did you miss something? Only the closing brace. (Tauri)
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
All correct.
Did you miss something? Only the closing brace. (Tauri)

Great! At 2 how can we disprove that formally? (Wondering)
 
A question of my own.

Say we have [math]A = \{1, 2, 4 \}[/math] and [math]B = \{ 1, 2, 3 \}[/math]

Why wouldn't [math]2^{A \times B}[/math] have sets with the form [math]\{ a_i, b_j \}[/math] rather than just [math]\{ a_i, b_i \}[/math]?

And, since we are talking about a Cartesian product wouldn't [math]2^{ \{ 1, 2 \} }[/math] be different from [math]2^{ \{ 2, 1 \} }[/math]?

Thanks!

-Dan
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K