What is the difference between ÷ and / in terms of Betti numbers?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter micromass
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the perceived differences between the symbols ÷ and / in the context of Betti numbers, framed humorously within a topological space perspective. Participants engage with the topic in a light-hearted manner, with some expressing confusion and others making jokes.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests considering ÷ and / as topological spaces to calculate their Betti numbers and questions how many Betti numbers differ.
  • Several participants indicate that the thread is intended as a joke, with comments about the absurdity of the topic.
  • Some express disbelief that the thread was initiated, with humorous reactions to the title.
  • There are references to confusion regarding the symbols and their meanings, particularly from those unfamiliar with the context.
  • A participant humorously comments on the psychological implications of using brackets in mathematical expressions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the thread is humorous and not to be taken seriously, but there is no consensus on the actual mathematical implications or interpretations of ÷ and /.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion about the symbols and their usage, indicating a lack of clarity in the discussion. The humorous nature of the thread may obscure any serious mathematical discourse.

micromass
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
22,170
Reaction score
3,333
So, if we consider ÷ and / as topological spaces (as subsets of [tex]\mathbb{R}^2[/tex]). Then we can calculate the Betti numbers of these spaces. The question is how many Betti numbers of these spaces are actually different from each other...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For people not understanding it: This thread is a joke (: I just wanted to surprise the people who tought it would be just one of these silly threads, about that cursed equation...

Take it lightly :biggrin:
 
I came in here about to launch off on a rant then...

...good recovery!
 
Me too, I couldn't believe micromass would start such a thread!
 
:/

Btw, what does this (:÷) mean?
 
A disgrace micro, a disgrace.
 
I immediately facepalmed when I saw the title of this thread. Where's the Picard facepalm picture when you need it.
 
gb7nash said:
I immediately facepalmed when I saw the title of this thread. Where's the Picard facepalm picture when you need it.

At your service:

[PLAIN]http://scienceblogs.com/sunclipse/picard-facepalm.jpg

:biggrin:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nope, it was worse than that:

[URL]http://lolpics.se/pics/482.jpg[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Maybe it was even worse:

181148-triple_facepalm_super.jpg


Ah, allo allo :biggrin:
 
  • #11
Ah to hell with it:

[PLAIN]http://chzupnextinsports.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/funny-sports-pictures-quadruple-facepalm.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
Now, if even Jesus finds it stupid...

http://myspace.roflposters.com/images/rofl/myspace/1219849361552.jpg.%5Broflposters.com%5D.myspace.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #14
Betti? I preferred Veronica, but then a Jughead can't touch that...

Archie Award for micromass (we're all out of Reggies)
 
  • #15
He's lucky, it was nearly a Darwin award for committing PF suicide.
 
  • #16
"Difference between ÷ and /"

The latter is stick.
The first is a stick with two dots above and below it.

Hey, you asked for it.


*cracks up*
 
  • #17
FtlIsAwesome said:
*cracks up*

You can get a cream for that...
 
  • #18
For everyone who's not following Spiked Math, I have the impression that Mike does follow PF! :biggrin:

415-dear-internet.png
 
  • #19
eh? am i the only one confused about this divide vs. divide divide?

i always used a RPN calculator, so i have no idea what's going on here. (well, a TI briefly for a stats class because it was required.)
 
  • #20
hmmm.. the inertia of the brackets lends its weight psychologically to the hidden multiplier, leading to the wrong conclusion.. I shall have to speak to my shaman about this disturbance in the force.. Jar Jar Binks strikes again

1/0 = err
0/1 = 0
1/0 x 0/1 = 1 (which let's 1/0 go free on a technicality)
the above completes my trinary data model
 
  • #21
http://real-college-life.com/fnmeng.info/Pictures/%5BH%5Dard%20Pictures/But%20then%20I%20lol%27d/yo-dawg-at-first-i-was-like.jpg
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K