I What is the difference between collisionless and self-interacting dark matter?

AI Thread Summary
Collisionless dark matter refers to particles that do not scatter or collide with each other, interacting primarily through gravity, as described by the Lambda Cold Dark Matter (LCDM) model. In contrast, self-interacting dark matter (SIDM) allows for interactions between dark matter particles, which can lead to different cosmic structures and dynamics. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding these distinctions to grasp dark matter's role in the universe. Clarifying these terms is crucial for advancing theories in cosmology. Overall, the differences between collisionless and self-interacting dark matter have significant implications for our understanding of the universe.
Ranku
Messages
433
Reaction score
18
When dark matter is called collisionless, does it only mean that they do not collide and scatter, or does it also mean that there is no other significant non-contact interaction?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
That would be the LCDM theory of dark matter.
I would think collisionless means no physical scattering, no interaction whatsoever, except through gravity.
But let us have a second opinion before you send off.
Keep you finger on the keyboard.

There is also the SIDM - self interacting dark matter.
 

Thread 'Does it make sense to build new radio telescopes?'

TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
View full post »
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'

Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'

This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Galaxy collision separates dark matter from regular matter
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Distinguishing between the effects of dark matter and MOND
Replies
40
Views
5K
I N-body simulation of high or low-mass dark matter particles
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Shell structure topological defects as substitute for dark matter
Replies
3
Views
2K
B Light and the black matter (Dark Matter)
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Dark matter + gravity is 'right', or our understanding of gravity is wrong?
Replies
35
Views
4K
I Does Dark Matter Fall into Black Holes?
Replies
12
Views
2K
B Question regarding supermassive black holes in the early Universe
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Is Dark Matter Challenging Our Understanding of the Universe?
Replies
22
Views
6K
A Dark Matter Accretion Disk for Black Hole (Neutron Star)
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top