What is the difference between compression ratio and cut off ratio?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinction between compression ratio and cutoff ratio in internal combustion engines. The compression ratio is defined as the ratio of maximum cylinder volume to minimum cylinder volume, while the cutoff ratio is the ratio of the volume after combustion to the volume before combustion. Higher compression ratios lead to increased efficiency due to the greater energy recovery during the expansion phase, whereas higher cutoff ratios result in decreased efficiency as they indicate a lower average expansion ratio for the combustion gases. Understanding these concepts is crucial for optimizing engine performance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of internal combustion engine mechanics
  • Familiarity with thermodynamics principles
  • Knowledge of volumetric efficiency in engines
  • Basic grasp of energy transfer and work production
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of different compression ratios on engine performance
  • Explore thermodynamic cycles, specifically the Otto cycle
  • Learn about volumetric efficiency and its impact on engine design
  • Investigate the relationship between fuel types and optimal compression ratios
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, automotive enthusiasts, and anyone involved in optimizing internal combustion engine performance will benefit from this discussion.

aero&astro
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I know the cut off ratio is of the specific volumes, but is that it? And what exactly do they tell you
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The cutoff ratio is the ratio of the volume after combustion to the volume before combustion. The compression ratio is the ratio of the maximum volume to the minimum volume.

Efficiency goes up with compression ratio and down with cutoff ratio.
 
Why does the efficiency go up with compression ratio and the cutoff ratio down?
(I don't really understand the physics/thermodynamics behind it

Thank you
 
a simple way to look at this is ...in internal combustion engine- power comes from very fast burning of fuel / air mixture. the more of this mixture you can cram into the cylinder before ignition, the more power..and ( this is a very simplified explanation) the for volumetric efficiency. If you opened up a cylinder and let atmospheric pressure fill it up , and then closed the cylinder, you would have a compression ration of 1 to 1. Since we have crank shaft and pistons and valves moving around the IC sucks in air /fuel mixture and compresses it when the valve train closes the intake port. This mixture is squeezed when the piston moves toward the top of the cylinder and if you measured the amount the volume was squeezed or compressed at the end of this action your now have the ratio of the fuel / air mixture before and after the compression. Most lame passenger cars today have about 8:t or 8 to 1 compression ration. When you light off this mixture your get a measureable amount of work that can be done with this mixture. The piston is moved toward the bottom of the cylinder bu the fast burning action of the ignited mix and we have force being applied to the top of the piston. F x D = work...since the whole mechanism is rotating via crank shaft this action happens many times per minute ( RPM = revolutions per minute) so we have F x D / Time = Power

If all things are equal during this process, and we can cram twice as much fuel / air mixture into this same cylinder and light it we ( theoretically) should produce twice the power so the IC with a 16:t compression ration would make a lot more power and hence the volumetric efficiency thing..
 
Is it possible to explain it much simpler please? ( I am very weak in physics.)

So basically,

What I know so far is (in simple steps)

1) In a box, air is compressed.

2) Fuel is added

so

3) ignites

4) and produce work


if compression ratio goes up, efficiency increases. But why? because we can put more Air in the box ? I am sorry I am totally confused.
 
student23 said:
Is it possible to explain it much simpler please? ( I am very weak in physics.)

So basically,

What I know so far is (in simple steps)

1) In a box, air is compressed.

2) Fuel is added

so

3) ignites

4) and produce work


if compression ratio goes up, efficiency increases. But why? because we can put more Air in the box ? I am sorry I am totally confused.

The reason lies mostly in your 4th point: «and produce work». To answer your question, you need to ask the real question: How does it produce work?

When you ignite the fuel mixture, the heat produced transfer energy to the air inside the cylinder. Now you need to recover that energy to produce mechanical work. At this point, you need to look at air as if it was a compressed spring. If a compressed spring expands, it releases its stored energy producing mechanical work (creating some motion, somehow). The more it expands, the more energy you can recover. When the piston goes down in a cylinder, it gives space to the burned fuel mixture to expand. The compression ratio that was, say, 10:1 became an expansion ratio of 10:1. The greater the expansion ratio, the greater the energy recovered (or, in other words, work produced) for the same amount of fuel burned. Thus, the «higher compression ratio = higher efficiency» statement.

So, the important thing is not how much you compress the air before the ignition, but how much you expand it after the fuel is completely burned.

Now you can also see the importance of the cutoff ratio. The first particles of air that were heated up when the piston was at top dead center (TDC) will have a full expansion ratio of 10:1. But the ones that were heated up at the end the combustion process may have an expansion ratio of only 8:1 (because the piston is not at TDC anymore). Hence a higher cutoff ratio will give less efficiency because it means that the «average» expansion ratio for all air particles is lower.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Satish

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K