What is the Difference Between Limit Superior and Limit Inferior in Sequences?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kaosAD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of limit superior and limit inferior in sequences, particularly in relation to a piecewise function and its behavior as sequences converge to zero from different directions. Participants explore the definitions and implications of these limits in the context of specific sequences.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents definitions of limit superior and limit inferior, using a piecewise function to illustrate their behavior as sequences converge to zero from the left and right.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about the initial approach and suggests that the function has a limit at positive infinity, leading to equal lim sup and lim inf values.
  • A later reply acknowledges the misunderstanding and clarifies that lim sup is defined as the supremum over all sequences converging to zero, indicating that selecting a specific sequence does not yield a general conclusion.
  • Further questions arise regarding the nature of limits and whether a range can be assigned to the limit of the function as it approaches zero.
  • One participant asserts that the limit cannot be expressed as defined because it is undefined, but notes that limit points can be discussed in terms of lim inf and lim sup.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of limit superior and limit inferior, particularly in relation to specific sequences and the behavior of the function at zero. There is no consensus on the implications of the limits or the validity of certain expressions regarding the limit at zero.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the behavior of the function at zero and the definitions of limits in this context. The discussion highlights the complexity of applying these concepts to specific sequences and functions.

kaosAD
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
I have questions regarding this subject.

By definition, [tex]\limsup_{k \to \infty} f(x_k) \equiv \lim_{k \to \infty} \sup_{n \geq k} f(x_n)[/tex] and [tex]\liminf_{k \to \infty} f(x_k) \equiv \lim_{k \to \infty} \inf_{n \geq k} f(x_n)[/tex]. Say a sequence [tex]\{x_k\}[/tex] converging to [tex]0[/tex] from the left in the following example.

[tex]f(y) = \left\{ <br /> \begin{array}{ll}<br /> y + 1 & \quad ,y > 0 \\<br /> y & \quad ,y \leq 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right.[/tex]

Then [tex]\limsup_{k \to \infty} f(x_k) = \liminf_{k \to \infty} f(x_k) = f(0)[/tex].

Suppose we have another sequence [tex]\{x_k\}[/tex] converging to [tex]0[/tex] from the right. Then [tex]\limsup_{k \to \infty} f(x_k) = \liminf_{k \to \infty} f(x_k) > f(0)[/tex].

What is the difference between [tex]\limsup_{k \to \infty} f(x_k)[/tex] and [tex]\liminf_{k \to \infty} f(x_k)[/tex]? I don't see any difference.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm very confused as to what you're actually doing.

Anyways, your function has an actual limit at [itex]+\infty[/itex]: in particular,

[tex]\lim_{y \rightarrow +\infty} f(y) = +\infty[/tex]

so of course the lim sup and lim inf are going to be equal.


I suspect you meant to take a one sided limit at zero.. but again, the function has an actual limit there:

[tex]\lim_{y \rightarrow 0^+} f(y) = 1[/tex]

so again, the lim sup and lim inf are going to be equal.



Oh, I think I've figured out what you're trying to do.

What you're forgetting is that

[tex]\limsup_{y \rightarrow 0} f(y)[/tex]

is the supremum over all sequences that converge to zero and for which [itex]f(x_k)[/itex] converges. So just picking a particular sequence and saying that the lim sup equals the limit of that sequence is wrong.
 
Last edited:
Hurkyl said:
I'm very confused as to what you're actually doing.
Sorry for not explaining my problem clearer.

Hurkyl said:
Oh, I think I've figured out what you're trying to do.

What you're forgetting is that

[tex]\limsup_{y \rightarrow 0} f(y)[/tex]

is the supremum over all sequences that converge to zero and for which [itex]f(x_k)[/itex] converges. So just picking a particular sequence and saying that the lim sup equals the limit of that sequence is wrong.

That was what my problem was. Many thanks, Hurkyl! :)
Does this mean [itex]\lim_{k \to \infty} f(x_k)[/itex] is the limit over all sequences as well?

Also, using the given example, can I write [itex]0 \leq \lim_{x \to 0} f(x) \leq 1[/itex]? or that [itex]\lim_{x \to 0} f(x)[/itex] does not exist, so we cannot write down its range?
 
You can't write that expression for the limit, because as you said, the limit is undefined.

You can say that all of the limit points are in that interval, though, because lim inf and lim sup are the minimum and maximum of the limit points.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K