What is the difference between roots and weights in Lie algebra theory?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the distinctions between roots and weights in Lie algebra theory, particularly in the context of the sl(3) algebra. It is established that elements of Lie groups can be represented through generators, forming a Lie algebra characterized by commutators. The Cartan subalgebra (CSA) consists of commuting generators, whose eigenvalues are classified as roots or weights. The confusion arises from the representation of root vectors in sl(3) and the relationship between eigenvalues and the structure of the algebra, specifically noting that roots are used in the adjoint representation while weights apply in other contexts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lie groups and Lie algebras
  • Familiarity with Cartan subalgebras (CSA)
  • Knowledge of eigenvalues and eigenvectors in linear algebra
  • Basic concepts of representation theory in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Cartan subalgebras in various Lie algebras
  • Learn about the representation theory of sl(3) and its applications
  • Explore the relationship between roots and weights in Lie algebra representations
  • Investigate the role of ladder operators in transforming eigenvectors
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students interested in advanced algebraic structures, particularly those focusing on representation theory and its applications in theoretical physics.

Andy_X
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I need some help with understanding the basics of Lie algebra theory. I suspect my problems are due to a fundamental misunderstanding somewhere so apologies in advance for the naivety of the questions and for the restatement of elementary mathematics.
As I understand it elements of Lie groups can be represented in terms of a set of generators by exponentiation. The set of generators form a Lie algebra whose properties are determined by the commutators of the generators. A subset of the generators (the Cartan subalgebra or CSA ) commute and are simultaneously diagonalisable. The eigenvectors of the CSA generators are used to represent physical states. The remaining generators, referred to as step or ladder operators, when applied to the eigenvectors of the CSA generators transform them into other eigenvectors with corresponding eigenvalues that differ by 2 from the eigenvalue corresponding to the original eigenvector. The algebra can be largely defined in terms of the eigenvalues of the CSA generators which must be integer and are referred to as roots or weights. Is this correct and is there any difference between a root and a weight?
The specific problem I have involves sl(3). I have seen a representation of this in terms of 8 3*3 real matrices (related to the Gell-Mann matrices) of which 2 are diagonal with diagonals (1, -1,0) and (0,1,-1). I’ve also been told that the root vectors of sl(3) are α(1)=(2,1) α(2)=(-1,2) and θ=(2,1) apparently regardless of the representation used. However the eigenvalues of real diagonal matrices are the diagonal elements themselves so why are the elements of the root vectors different, why do they not differ by 2 and why are there three of them? Clearly I have misunderstood something basic here but despite referring to several texts I am unable to resolve. Any help appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Root is employed (instead of weight) when you are in the adjoint representation of the algebra.
Where have you found eigenvalues differ by 2? do not forget that the states in the CSA are eigenvectors with nul eigenvalues (commutation in the CSA).
Ie for su(3) you have 8 eigenvectors (2 in the CSA) and 3 pairs of ladders
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K