What is the distribution of forces on a swimming pool springboard?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobby2000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moments
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the distribution of forces on a swimming pool springboard, specifically focusing on the reaction forces at points A and B. The springboard is 4 meters long and weighs 300N, with a boy weighing 400N standing at point C. The forces acting at points A and B are derived using equilibrium equations, leading to the conclusion that RA (reaction force at A) and RB (reaction force at B) must satisfy the conditions of static equilibrium. The calculations reveal inconsistencies in the initial assumptions regarding the torque and forces involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium principles
  • Familiarity with torque calculations
  • Knowledge of reaction forces in mechanics
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of static equilibrium in mechanics
  • Learn about torque and its calculation in rigid body systems
  • Explore reaction forces and their applications in engineering
  • Practice solving problems involving forces on beams and levers
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics or engineering, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for examples of force distribution problems in static systems.

bobby2000
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The diagram (not included) shows a straight, horizontal swimming bath spring board of length 4m and weight 300N. It is freely hinged at A and rests on a roller at B where AB=1.6m. A boy of weight 400N standard at end C.
a) show directions of forces acting on A and B
b) calculate magnitudes of forces at A and at B

Homework Equations



A______________B______________C
AB= 1.6m
BC= 2.4m
AC= 4m

The Attempt at a Solution


Weight of board put at centre point (0.4m from B and 2m from C)
RA assigned as reaction force at A
RB assigned as reaction force at B

RA = 700-RB

RA+RB = 700N
(300x2)+(4x400)=RA+(RBx1.6)
2200=RA+(RBx1.6)
2200=700-RB+(RBx1.6)
1500=0.6RB
2500=RB

This figure for RB simply cannot be right and therefore really isn't helping me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(300x2)+(4x400)=RA+(RBx1.6) ---> this is the equation for the torques with respect to A. Why did you include the force RA?

ehild
 
I assumed RA was required for the anticlockwise moment? is it not?
 
RA is force, not torque. What is the torque of RA with respect to A? ehild
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
13K
Replies
1
Views
4K