What Is the Electric Potential of a Conducting Sphere Surrounded by a Shell?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the electric potential of a conducting sphere with a given charge, surrounded by a concentric conducting shell with an opposing charge. The context is within electrostatics, specifically focusing on the behavior of electric potential in relation to spherical conductors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of electric potential using the formula for both the inner sphere and the outer shell. There is a focus on the implications of Gauss's Law and the contributions of the electric field from the charges involved. Questions are raised about the validity of the initial calculations and the interpretation of the problem setup.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and corrections regarding the calculations and the understanding of the problem. Some participants have suggested alternative approaches to calculating the potential, while others have clarified units and concepts related to the charges involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the units of charge (nC vs. µC) and the setup of the problem, particularly in relation to the distances used in calculations. Participants are also considering the implications of setting the potential to zero at infinity and how that affects the potential at the surfaces of the conductors.

bmarvs04
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A conducting sphere 4.5 cm in radius carries 40 nC. It's surrounded by a concentric spherical conducting shell of radius 20 cm carrying -40 nC.

Find the potential at the sphere's surface, taking the zero of potential at infinity.

Homework Equations



Inside Sphere: V = Q / (4*pi*ε0*R)
Outside Sphere: V = Q / (4*pi*ε0*r)

The Attempt at a Solution



So I figured I would add these two potentials up, giving this:

V = 9*10^9 [ ( 4*10^-5 ) / .045 + ( -4*10^-5) /.2 ] = 6200000V
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no place where the distance from the center of the charges is .045 and .2, so your calc can't be right. Also, what the heck is a nC? NanoCoulomb?

I'm confused about this one - hope LowlyPion will help us out!
I'm picturing the "sphere" inside a "shell" (hollow sphere). Are we interested in the potential at the surface of the inner sphere?

Do you know about Gauss's Law and Gaussian surfaces?
Using that, I think the E field outside the outer shell is zero, so if we were to find V by integrating E from infinity into the surface of the inner sphere, there would be no contribution from the outer charge at all. Only the inner one need be considered and only from 20 cm to 4.5 cm.
 
Yes, nC is a nanoCoulomb, which is why my calculations were converted to Coulombs (4*10^-5). Also, I think what you're picture is correct.. and yes we are interested in the potential at the surface of the inner sphere.

Also, I probably should have said this earlier: my calculations were based off this question:

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090120101033AAplj9b

Except in that example the spherical shell is non-conducting..
 
The site posted only the numerical answer to a different question - or did I miss something?
Check that charge. 40 nC = 40 x 10^-9 C = 4 x 10^-8 C.

No doubt there is an easier way, but using V = integral of E*dr I get
V = kQ*integral (dr/r^2) from 20 cm to 4.5 cm and Q is 40 nC of the inner charge only.
V = -kQ/r evaluated at the two radii
V = -kQ(1/.045 - 1/.2)
 
the guassian surfaces and field description sound good

so if the datum for the potential is zero at infinity, the potential will be zero at the boundary
of the shell

so how about you calculate the potential due to the sphere at the shell radius assuming there is no shell

similarly calculate the potential at the sphere surface due to the sphere assuming no shell

putting the shell in effectively shifts the potential at the shell to zero, so shift the potential at the sphere by the same amount
 
Ha! Good catch! that ended up being the problem.. The correct answer was 6200V.. I've been doing problems with microCoulombs so I must've gotten screwed up between the two.

Thanks a bunch

And by the way, your last line of work is correct.. When I wrote it in my first post I just factored out the Q
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
771
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K