MHB What is the Equivalence Class for a Fixed Integer in Hurricane Lane's Aftermath?

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proofs Set
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
View attachment 8332
ok need help with these 3 questions

I know its fairly easy but its new to me, so

we have had hurricane Lane here this week
but mahalo much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
13. Showing that the given relation is an equivalence relation is straightforward. I suppose you are stuck at describing the equivalence classes. Let $a$ be a fixed integer. What is the equivalence class containing $a$, i.e. $[a]$? Well, $b\in[a]$ $\iff$ $b\sim a$ $\iff$ $b-a=n\in\mathbb Z$ $\iff$ $b=a+n$ $\iff$ $b\in\{a+n:n\in\mathbb Z\}$. Hence $[a]=\{a+n:n\in\mathbb Z\}$.

14. Is this relation transitive? Hint: $1\cdot0\ge0$ and $0\cdot(-1)\ge0$.

15: Suppose $\frak P$ is a partition of a set $S$; then the relation is $a\sim b$ iff $a$ and $b$ belong to the same subset of $S$ in $\frak P$. By the definition of a partition, every member of $S$ belongs to some subset of $S$ in $\frak P$; hence ~ is reflexive. It is clearly symmetric. I’ll leave you to show that it is transitive, hence an equivalence relation.
 
Olinguito said:
13. Showing that the given relation is an equivalence relation is straightforward. I suppose you are stuck at describing the equivalence classes. Let $a$ be a fixed integer. What is the equivalence class containing $a$, i.e. $[a]$? Well, $b\in[a]$ $\iff$ $b\sim a$ $\iff$ $b-a=n\in\mathbb Z$ $\iff$ $b=a+n$ $\iff$ $b\in\{a+n:n\in\mathbb Z\}$. Hence $[a]=\{a+n:n\in\mathbb Z\}$.

14. Is this relation transitive? Hint: $1\cdot0\ge0$ and $0\cdot(-1)\ge0$.

15: Suppose $\frak P$ is a partition of a set $S$; then the relation is $a\sim b$ iff $a$ and $b$ belong to the same subset of $S$ in $\frak P$. By the definition of a partition, every member of $S$ belongs to some subset of $S$ in $\frak P$; hence ~ is reflexive. It is clearly symmetric. I’ll leave you to show that it is transitive, hence an equivalence relation.


that was very helpful ;)
 
The world of 2\times 2 complex matrices is very colorful. They form a Banach-algebra, they act on spinors, they contain the quaternions, SU(2), su(2), SL(2,\mathbb C), sl(2,\mathbb C). Furthermore, with the determinant as Euclidean or pseudo-Euclidean norm, isu(2) is a 3-dimensional Euclidean space, \mathbb RI\oplus isu(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (1,3), i\mathbb RI\oplus su(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (3,1), SU(2) is the double cover of SO(3), sl(2,\mathbb C) is the...