What is the formula for calculating rotation speed?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of rotation speed in relation to electron spin, exploring the implications of quantum mechanics on classical analogs of rotation. Participants examine the relationship between angular momentum, speed, and the size of electrons, as well as the interpretations of spin in the context of particle physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference a wiki quote stating that electrons are spin-1/2 particles with two possible spin values, suggesting that if this were due to rotation, electrons would need to spin faster than light, which is deemed impossible.
  • Others propose that the spin of an electron may be understood as angular momentum generated by a circulating flow of energy in its wave field, as suggested by an article by Hans C. Ohanian.
  • One participant challenges the classical electron radius cited in the discussion, arguing that it is incorrectly stated as 14 nm and should be much smaller, noting that the classical electron radius is approximately 2.8 x 10^-15 m.
  • Another participant mentions the formula for angular momentum of a sphere and relates it to the spin angular momentum of the electron, indicating that using the classical electron radius leads to speeds exceeding the speed of light.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the circulating flow model for explaining electron spin, questioning the implications of mass and charge distribution over larger spaces and the nature of electron spin returning to its original state after a rotation of 4π.
  • One participant suggests consulting the definition of angular momentum for further clarification on the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the nature of electron spin and its relation to classical rotation, with no consensus reached on the interpretation of spin or the validity of the circulating flow model.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the assumptions regarding electron size and the implications of classical analogs in quantum mechanics, as well as unresolved mathematical relationships between radius, speed, and angular momentum.

zincshow
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
In wiki under spin it says:

"Electrons are spin-1⁄2 particles. These have only two possible spin angular momentum values, called spin-up and spin-down. The exact value in the z direction is +ħ/2 or −ħ/2. If this value arises as a result of the particles rotating the way a planet rotates, then the individual particles would have to be spinning impossibly fast. Even if the electron radius were as large as 14 nm (classical electron radius) then it would have to be rotating at 2.3×10^11 m/s. The speed of rotation would be in excess of the speed of light, 2.998×10^8 m/s, and is thus impossible.[2] Thus, the spin angular momentum has nothing to do with rotation and is a purely quantum mechanical phenomenon."

This quote implies a calculation to relate the radius and speed, what is the formula that is used in this calculation to get the rotation speed? TIA
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you can get this article,

What is spin? by Hans C. Ohanian

American Journal of Physics -- June 1986 -- Volume 54, Issue 6, pp. 500-505
Issue Date: June 1986

from the abstract:

According to the prevailing belief, the spin of the electron or of some other particle is a mysterious internal angular momentum for which no concrete physical picture is available, and for which there is no classical analog. However, on the basis of an old calculation by Belinfante [Physica 6, 887 (1939)], it can be shown that the spin may be regarded as an angular momentum generated by a circulating flow of energy in the wave field of the electron. Likewise, the magnetic moment may be regarded as generated by a circulating flow of charge in the wave field. This provides an intuitively appealing picture and establishes that neither the spin nor the magnetic moment are ``internal''—they are not associated with the internal structure of the electron, but rather with the structure of its wave field. Furthermore, a comparison between calculations of angular momentum in the Dirac and electromagnetic fields shows that the spin of the electron is entirely analogous to the angular momentum carried by a classical circularly polarized wave.

©1986 American Association of Physics Teachers
 
zincshow said:
In wiki under spin it says:

"Electrons are spin-1⁄2 particles. These have only two possible spin angular momentum values, called spin-up and spin-down. The exact value in the z direction is +ħ/2 or −ħ/2. If this value arises as a result of the particles rotating the way a planet rotates, then the individual particles would have to be spinning impossibly fast. Even if the electron radius were as large as 14 nm (classical electron radius) then it would have to be rotating at 2.3×10^11 m/s. The speed of rotation would be in excess of the speed of light, 2.998×10^8 m/s, and is thus impossible.[2] Thus, the spin angular momentum has nothing to do with rotation and is a purely quantum mechanical phenomenon."

This quote implies a calculation to relate the radius and speed, what is the formula that is used in this calculation to get the rotation speed? TIA

The classical electron radius is not 14nm. (nm --> fm is correct?). nm is too big. For example, the proton size is 10^-15 m.
If the electron is a sphere, the (spinning) angular momentum is 2/5 Me r^2 w. (Me: electron mass, r: sphere radius, w: angular frequency).
This value is equal to the spin angular momentum, 1/2 hbar.
If the r is the classical electron radius (2.8 x 10^-15 m), the sphere speed rw becomes more than 100 times the speed of light.

Spinnor said:
If you can get this article,

What is spin? by Hans C. Ohanian

American Journal of Physics -- June 1986 -- Volume 54, Issue 6, pp. 500-505
Issue Date: June 1986

from the abstract:

According to the prevailing belief, the spin of the electron or of some other particle is a mysterious internal angular momentum for which no concrete physical picture is available, and for which there is no classical analog. However, on the basis of an old calculation by Belinfante [Physica 6, 887 (1939)], it can be shown that the spin may be regarded as an angular momentum generated by a circulating flow of energy in the wave field of the electron. Likewise, the magnetic moment may be regarded as generated by a circulating flow of charge in the wave field. This provides an intuitively appealing picture and establishes that neither the spin nor the magnetic moment are ``internal''—they are not associated with the internal structure of the electron, but rather with the structure of its wave field. Furthermore, a comparison between calculations of angular momentum in the Dirac and electromagnetic fields shows that the spin of the electron is entirely analogous to the angular momentum carried by a classical circularly polarized wave.

©1986 American Association of Physics Teachers

This is interesting. But the electron has the mass and charge. And the electron is known to be too small. You say the mass and charge of one electron is actually spreading over much larger space? If so, the electron size will be much bigger by the scattering experiment?
And you say the electron spin is caused by the actual circulating frow?
But the spinning electrons go back to their original forms when they are rotated by an angle of 4 pi (not 2 pi).
I think that it is difficult to explain the electron spin using the actual circulating flow model.
 
Last edited:
zincshow said:
This quote implies a calculation to relate the radius and speed, what is the formula that is used in this calculation to get the rotation speed? TIA

Uh, try the definition of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_momentum" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K