MHB What is the formula for finding angle theta without accounting for height?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xyz_1965
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Theta
xyz_1965
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
AngleofElevationEx1a.png.cf.png


Here is my set up.

Let t = theta for short

tan(t) = 324/550

arctan(tan t) = arctan(324/550)

t = arctan(324/550)

Correct thus far?

Note: What does "not to scale" mean in other words?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
$\tan{\theta} = \dfrac{324-1.6}{550}$
 
skeeter said:
$\tan{\theta} = \dfrac{324-1.6}{550}$

What is wrong with my approach?
 
xyz_1965 said:
What is wrong with my approach?

You aren't accounting for the height of the person.
 
MarkFL said:
You aren't accounting for the height of the person.

Ok. I totally forgot about the height of the person.

tan (theta) = (height of tower - height of person)/(distance between person and the base of the tower). This will help me when I face a similar problem again.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top