What is the Frequency in Einstein's Quantum Expression?

exmarine
Messages
241
Reaction score
11
Einstein’s discovery that a photon has a finite quantum of energy proportional to its discrete frequency, and the representation of that photon as a wave packet, gives me a problem.
E = h ν
The photon packet waveform surely must have a beginning and an end? It is probably continuous, etc.? The transform of such a packet waveform, whatever its precise shape, must contain many frequencies in order to “localize” the photon between its beginning and end. So what is the frequency in Einstein’s quantum expression?
Any thoughts are appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Right. A photon cannot be described in any way as classical particles nor as classical field. They are described by a quantized massless field with spin 1. There is, e.g., not even a welldefined position operator as for massive-particle fields.

You are also right in saying that a true one-photon Fock state, i.e., one that is normalizable to 1 is a wave packet and thus has a finite energy and momentum uncertainty. The plain-wave "states", i.e., energy-momentum eigenstates are generalized states in the sense of distributions, which becomes clear by the fact that they are only normlizable "to a [itex]\delta[/itex] distribution":
[tex]\langle \vec{p},\lambda| \vec{p}',\lambda' \rangle=\delta^{(3)}(\vec{p}-\vec{p}') \delta_{\lambda \lambda '},[/tex]
where [itex]\lambda \in \pm 1[/itex] denotes the helicity of the single-photon state.
 
So what is the frequency in Einstein’s quantum expression?
Any thoughts are appreciated.
... it's the one that was understood as the frequency of the incoming light in his day. The frequency in the classical electromagnetic wave model.
see also

[itex]E=h\nu[/itex] shows how the idea of light coming in a lump is related to the idea that light comes in waves - what we've been calling "frequency" up to then is in fact "energy". Just like [itex]E=mc^2[/itex] shows that what we've been calling "mass" is also energy.


... as you see from vanhees71, there is, now, a more consistent description.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
7K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
10K