What is the function of a reaction/momentum wheel?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the function and application of reaction and momentum wheels in satellite attitude control, particularly in the context of CubeSats. Participants explore the mechanics, configurations, and limitations of these systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on the basic function of reaction and momentum wheels, expressing confusion about their operation in attitude control for CubeSats.
  • Another participant describes a momentum wheel as a motor with moderate rotating mass that can control satellite orientation by spinning in one direction to induce rotation in the opposite direction.
  • A subsequent reply corrects the previous post regarding the number of wheels, stating that satellites typically have four wheels for redundancy, with one positioned at a 45-degree angle to the others.
  • Discussion includes the concept of saturation, where wheels can spin too fast, necessitating a desaturation burn using thrusters to maintain satellite orientation.
  • Some participants note that CubeSats, particularly those weighing around 1 kg, generally do not use reaction wheels due to weight constraints, while others mention that larger CubeSats may incorporate them.
  • There is mention of a specific CubeSat designed to test micro reaction wheels, although it is noted that these wheels may not effectively stop a CubeSat from spinning about an axis.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the concept of saturation and its implications for the behavior of reaction wheels at that state.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the basic function of momentum wheels in attitude control but disagree on the specifics of their implementation in CubeSats, particularly regarding the number of wheels and their effectiveness. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal use of reaction wheels in smaller satellites.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying definitions of saturation and the specific configurations of CubeSats that may affect the applicability of reaction wheels. The discussion reflects a range of assumptions about satellite design and operational constraints.

flame_m13
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
i apologize if this question is very basic. What is a reaction/ momentum wheel? I've been doing some research for a cubeSAT project, and these have popped up often in terms of attitude control. I really don't understand what a flywheel is, but if i knew that then maybe a reaction wheel would not seem so daunting. i know it's a wheel :) and it's motion affects that of the object you are trying to move...? i really don't understand how it works.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
A momentum wheel in a satellite is a motor of moderate rotating mass or has a moderate mass that is can spin. There are usually three, one for each axis. When the wheel is spun up in speed, the reaction torque rotates the satellite in the opposite direction. These can control the pointing of the satellite very accurately. When the wheel reaches its maximum speed (if there is a constant disturbing torque in the same direction), the wheel must be spun down against another independent torque source, such as a thruster or magnetic torque coil acting against the Earth's magnetic field. There is a complete attitude determination and control unit for CubeSats at cubesatkit.com
 
the above post is quite accurate, with the exception of the quantity. satellites almost always have 4 (the fourth being at a 45 to all the other planes for redundancy)

basically if 1 wheel wore out (they spin quite fast continuously) the 4th wheel could tak up the slack using its momentum component in the broken wheel's plane, and the other 2 wheels in the ortho planes would have to negate the other 2 components of the 4th's momentum.

when the wheels spin too fast, this is called saturation. you have to do a desaturation burn, where the wheels are basically stopped and thrusters fire to keep the satellite on course, then as the unbalanced torque builds, the wheels keep spinning up to saturation again and again.

way more fuel efficient than constant thruster firings for satellite pointing. of course satellite mass is the limiting factor for reaction wheels (bigger (massive) satellite means more massive wheels or faster wheel speeds)
 
In general CubeSats (satellites of 1 kg) do not have reaction wheels. they are too heavy. Picosats use http://cubesat.ifastnet.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=57 .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are some CubeSats with momentum wheels, particularly double or triple length CubeSats. I have not seen any CubeSats with the redundant 4th momentum wheel, due to space/mass limitations.
 
There is a cubesat made in Berlin, specially designed to test micro reaction wheels in space, see: http://cubesat.ifastnet.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=60
However, it looks like reaction wheels are not good for stopping a cubesat spinning about an axis. The de-spinning is done through other means.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In the above discussion there is a mention of the saturation of the reaction wheels after it reaches a certain rpm. I quite don't get what exactly does saturation mean? How does the reaction wheel behave at saturation?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
14K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
67
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K